Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.4 segfaults. #278

Closed
poetaster opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

3.4 segfaults. #278

poetaster opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@poetaster
Copy link

poetaster commented Mar 5, 2021

Sailfish, of course. Looks like end of the line.

Time to fork? I'm going to pick this apart for a sailfish build.

@poetaster
Copy link
Author

I just did a compile without any changes using the 3.4 SDK. All's well. Just works.

If you'd like I can take of maintaining?

@smurfy
Copy link
Owner

smurfy commented Mar 8, 2021

Does it work with older versions too or does it needs two builds?

I updated my other half to 3.4 now. but need to install all my sdk's again.

@poetaster
Copy link
Author

poetaster commented Mar 8, 2021

I believe it stopped working on 3.4. Installing the sdks is indeed a pita. I've only got, currently, one device and it was flashed directly to 3.4. I can try to get my fp2 running with, 3.3 for instance. have to ask mal for an image.

My compile had only the bahn.de backend (great for me :) enabled.

@poetaster
Copy link
Author

poetaster commented Mar 9, 2021

Ah, in the comments under: https://openrepos.net/content/smurfy/fahrplan-0
At least one other user notes the segfaults as of 3.4.

Some users at: https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/fahrplan-2-0-32-2/5388/4

mention that the old compile works for them under 3.4 and 4 ... I've asked if it was the openrepos or jolla compile

@Olf0
Copy link

Olf0 commented Aug 29, 2021

Just curious: Is this still being addressed, or at least analysed?

Note that varying compilation results with different build environments (e.g., a freshly installed SFOS-SDK vs. one used for long) might be a consequence of what Pull Request 273 "Add missing build dependencies" addresses.

P.S.: @smurfy, there are a couple of other PRs, many of which seem to make a lot of sense and IMO are looking fine, but all are stalled since early 2019.
Some of them contain meta-questions or -statements, which may ease your life, e.g., PR #269: "@smurfy is it possible for @dayrover to get write access?"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants