You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned in the following paper of Neural Subgraph Matching paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03092 , the dataset distribution of the imbalanced data is 3:1 (negative_sample: positive_sample),
but when we tried to get the distribution ourselves for the enzyme-imbalanced, we got the following outcome.
Total Sample - 2048
Positive Sample - 48
Negative Sample - 2000
It seems that it is not following distribution as mentioned in the paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We recently made an update of the paper (should be available on arxiv in a few days), where we changed the setting to focus on matching neighborhood as well as the entire graph. The label imbalance is close to what you mentioned here (see the label imbalance section in appendix).
But for the table 1 we are using the balanced setting (equal number of positive and negative examples)
As mentioned in the following paper of Neural Subgraph Matching paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03092 , the dataset distribution of the imbalanced data is 3:1 (negative_sample: positive_sample),
but when we tried to get the distribution ourselves for the enzyme-imbalanced, we got the following outcome.
Total Sample - 2048
Positive Sample - 48
Negative Sample - 2000
It seems that it is not following distribution as mentioned in the paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: