Skip to content

discussion#555 should be made to look like it's no longer active, with more blatant link to current "project"16 #635

@TallTed

Description

@TallTed

Originally posted by @TallTed in #633 (review)

Note that #555 still looks alive. Someone coming back to it, to see the latest addition to the bottom of the table, won't necessarily see the top-posted notice that it's been closed with new info being posted at Special Topic Meetings. I suggest adding <strike> or similar markup to make clear what is no longer valid.

Also note that Special Topic Meetings requires more thinking, parsing the date column which is no longer in ISO-numerics, figuring out that "status — done" means the meeting has been held... and now, it's even more challenging, because the last dated entry is (was) March 5 (which is now in the past) and shows status "discussed" instead of "done" or at least "scheduled" which seem to make more sense for a date in the past....

attn @csarven @VirginiaBalseiro

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions