-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Open
Description
Hello and thank you for forking!
I'm writing a utility to make multi-media WORM backups to blu-rays and I'm facing the following issue:
On PC1 (Debian 12 inside a Docker 12 docker with /dev/sr0 mounted) with Verbatim Slimline (USB) (externally powered) which is has a Pioneer drive inside :
- Creation of an ISO file (
genisoimage -allow-limited-size -R -J -iso-level 4 -o media.iso file.tar
) - ECC augmentation of the ISO (
dvdisaster -c -i media.iso -mRS03 -n BD --ecc-target image
) - Burning of the media (
growisofs -dvd-compat -use-the-force-luke=notray -speed=1 -Z /dev/sr0=media.iso
)
Verification always fails (same machine):
dvdisaster -a RS03 -r -d /dev/sr0 -i media1_pioneer.iso
dvdisaster -a RS03 --ecc-target image -i media1_pioneer.iso -t
Error correction properties:
- type : Augmented image
- method : RS03, 56 roots, 28.1% redundancy.
- created by : dvdisaster-0.79.10 (unstable)
- requires : dvdisaster-0.79
- data md5sum : none available
Data integrity:
- medium sectors : 11826135 total / 9162560 data
- good image/file : all sectors present
- data md5sum : 749fd65d5ea80ec554e24c54bf8ccca2
* Ecc block test : 46313 good, 64 bad; 130560 bad sub blocks
If repeated, the result is the same.
On PC2 (Windows 10 with a separate reader ASUS BW-16D1HT) the exact same disk can be read without any issue :
dvdisaster -a RS03 -r -d e: -i media1_asus.iso
dvdisaster -a RS03 --ecc-target image -i media1_asus.iso -t
Error correction properties:
- type : Augmented image
- method : RS03, 56 roots, 28.1% redundancy.
- created by : dvdisaster-0.79.10 (unstable)
- requires : dvdisaster-0.79
- data md5sum : none available
Data integrity:
- medium sectors : 11826135 total / 9162560 data
- good image/file : all sectors present
- data md5sum : 749fd65d5ea80ec554e24c54bf8ccca2
- Ecc block test : pass
In both cases I'm using the latest CLI release (win64-cli for Windows) : dvdisaster-0.79.10 pl3
I have not investigated further at the moment. Is there something obvious that can explain this situation ?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels