-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 511
Flaky test - TestAttestAgent/rate_limit_fails #5774
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
help wanted
Issues with this label are ready to start work but are in need of someone to do it
priority/backlog
Issue is approved and in the backlog
Comments
c4rlo
added a commit
to c4rlo/spire
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2025
To helpt track down occasional test failures. This flakeyness was reported previously in spiffe#5774 with improvements made in spiffe#5815, but it is still happening.
c4rlo
added a commit
to c4rlo/spire
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2025
To helpt track down occasional test failures. This flakeyness was reported previously in spiffe#5774 with improvements made in spiffe#5815, but it is still happening. Signed-off-by: Carlo Teubner <[email protected]>
c4rlo
added a commit
to c4rlo/spire
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2025
This flakeyness was reported previously in spiffe#5774 with improvements made in spiffe#5815, but was still happening. Hopefully fix it, by not assuming that the gRPC Send() message must not return an error; it is legitimately allowed to return io.EOF, in the case where the server has returned an application-level error, which we can then obtain via a Recv() call. See https://pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/grpc#ClientStream.SendMsg Signed-off-by: Carlo Teubner <[email protected]>
c4rlo
added a commit
to c4rlo/spire
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2025
This flakeyness was reported previously in spiffe#5774 with improvements made in spiffe#5815, but was still happening. Hopefully fix it, by not assuming that the gRPC Send() message must not return an error; it is legitimately allowed to return io.EOF, in the case where the server has returned an application-level error, which we can then obtain via a Recv() call. See https://pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/grpc#ClientStream.SendMsg Signed-off-by: Carlo Teubner <[email protected]>
c4rlo
added a commit
to c4rlo/spire
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2025
This flakeyness was reported previously in spiffe#5774 with improvements made in spiffe#5815, but was still happening. Hopefully fix it, by not assuming that the gRPC Send() message must not return an error; it is legitimately allowed to return io.EOF, in the case where the server has returned an application-level error, which we can then obtain via a Recv() call. See https://pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/grpc#ClientStream.SendMsg Signed-off-by: Carlo Teubner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted
Issues with this label are ready to start work but are in need of someone to do it
priority/backlog
Issue is approved and in the backlog
https://github.com/spiffe/spire/actions/runs/12777880767/job/35619626996?pr=5762
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: