Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 4, 2025. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 4, 2025. It is now read-only.

Should xarray:storage_options be split to a separate extension? #1

@TomAugspurger

Description

@TomAugspurger

One of the fields currently in this extension is xarray:storage_options. This describes additional options necessary to open an fsspec URI.

Should that go in its own repository / stac extension? fsspec-style URLs are usable by libraries other than xarray. For example, pandas uses it on its non-HTTPs backend, Zarr can use it independently of xarray.

I really only stuffed it here because creating two repositories with one field each sounded like an unnecessary amount of overhead. But I can split things if we think it would be useful.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions