-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New S3-FileSystem Implementation not compatible with s3connection resource reference #712
Comments
Hi @therealslimjp, trino-op 24.11.0 does not know (or care) about the native S3 implementation at all. Currently trino-op always configures the What I can offer you is that
|
Thanks for the rapid response. I guess we'll wait for 470. Option 2 may be useful and would render some of our problem aspects solved, but we would still have to put in the new fields for s3.access-key and s3.secret-access-key hardcoded into the catalog yaml. I naively would rather have a replacement/mapping-like function to change the keys of some of those key-pairs coming into the catalog via the s3connection . But that's just my problem, so it is not entirely thought through yet on my side😄 |
But anyway, we do not have the urgent requirement to get a workaround for our currently used version. It's fine for us just waiting for 470, so do not stress at all. |
Thanks for the feedback! |
Affected Stackable version
24.11.0
Affected Trino version
451
Current and expected behavior
We are currently migrating from legacy s3 file system to the new standard s3 filesystem (https://trino.io/docs/current/object-storage/file-system-s3.html#migration-from-legacy-s3-file-system)
we encountered an error using TrinoCatalogs and S3Connection as reference like this:
here, trino is a s3 connection looking like this:
this is the error we obtain:
it looks like properties like hive.s3.* are added, but incompatible when fs.native-s3.enabled = true.
Possible solution
No response
Additional context
No response
Environment
No response
Would you like to work on fixing this bug?
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: