(imp) support aliases in get_specialized_type_var_map

[alexey-pelykh]

Description

Support aliases (TypeVar passthrough) in get_specialized_type_var_map:

def test_get_specialized_type_var_map_double_generic_passthrough():
    @strawberry.type
    class Foo(Generic[_T]): ...

    @strawberry.type
    class Bar(Foo[_K], Generic[_K]): ...

    @strawberry.type
    class Bin(Bar[int]): ...

    assert get_specialized_type_var_map(Bin) == {
        "_T": int,
        "_K": int,
    }

Without this change, errors like

KeyError: '_T'

will appear

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Checklist

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

Summary by Sourcery

Support TypeVar passthrough in get_specialized_type_var_map.

Enhancements:

• Resolve type variables correctly when a generic type inherits from another generic type, passing the type variable through.

Tests:

• Add a test case for TypeVar passthrough with double generics.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces support for TypeVar passthrough in get_specialized_type_var_map. This allows the function to correctly resolve type variables when dealing with complex inheritance scenarios involving generic types.

Class diagram showing generic type inheritance example

classDiagram
    class Foo~T~{
        +Generic[T]
    }
    class Bar~K~{
        +Generic[K]
    }
    class Bin{
    }
    Foo <|-- Bar: Foo[K]
    Bar <|-- Bin: Bar[int]
    note for Bin "Resolves type variables:
_T = int
_K = int"

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Implemented TypeVar passthrough in get_specialized_type_var_map.	Modified the function to traverse the class hierarchy and collect type parameters. Added logic to resolve type variables passed through generic aliases. Updated the function to use an OrderedDict to preserve the order of type parameters. Added a loop to resolve type variables that are aliases of other type variables.	strawberry/utils/inspect.py
Added a new test case to verify the TypeVar passthrough functionality.	Created a new test case test_get_specialized_type_var_map_double_generic_passthrough. Added a new test case that uses a double generic passthrough to verify the fix.	tests/python_312/test_inspect.py tests/utils/test_inspect.py
Added a release note for the new feature.	Added a release note to the RELEASE.md file.	RELEASE.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @alexey-pelykh - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider adding inline documentation for the type variable resolution loop to explain the algorithm for future maintainers.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[botberry]

Thanks for adding the RELEASE.md file!

Here's a preview of the changelog:

---

Support aliases (TypeVar passthrough) in get_specialized_type_var_map.

Here's the tweet text:

🆕 Release (next) is out! Thanks to Alexey Pelykh for the PR 👏

Get it here 👉 https://strawberry.rocks/release/(next)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.77778% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.27%. Comparing base (7ba5928) to head (025e667).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3766   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.27%   97.27%           
=======================================
  Files         504      504           
  Lines       33480    33504   +24     
  Branches     5502     5512   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits        32566    32590   +24     
  Misses        703      703           
  Partials      211      211           

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3766 will not alter performance

_{Comparing alexey-pelykh:imp/get_specialized_type_var_map-double-generic-passthrough (025e667) with main (407b14f)}

Summary

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks