forked from tmieno2/R-as-GIS-for-Economists
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
SpatialInteractionVectorRaster.Rmd
752 lines (556 loc) · 28.4 KB
/
SpatialInteractionVectorRaster.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
# Spatial Interactions of Vector and Raster Data {#int-RV}
```{r chap5_setup, echo = FALSE, results = "hide"}
library(knitr)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
echo = TRUE,
cache = TRUE,
comment = NA,
message = FALSE,
warning = FALSE,
tidy = FALSE,
cache.lazy = FALSE
)
suppressMessages(library(here))
opts_knit$set(root.dir = here())
```
```{r , eval = FALSE, echo = FALSE}
setwd(here())
```
```{r, echo=FALSE, warning=FALSE, cache = FALSE}
#--- load packages ---#
suppressMessages(library(data.table))
suppressMessages(library(exactextractr))
suppressMessages(library(prism))
suppressMessages(library(sf))
suppressMessages(library(terra))
suppressMessages(library(raster))
suppressMessages(library(tidyverse))
suppressMessages(library(DT))
suppressMessages(library(tictoc))
suppressMessages(library(tmap))
suppressMessages(library(parallel))
suppressMessages(library(maps))
```
```{r figure_setup, echo = FALSE}
theme_update(
axis.title.x = element_text(size=12,angle=0,hjust=.5,vjust=-0.3,face="plain",family="Times"),
axis.title.y = element_text(size=12,angle=90,hjust=.5,vjust=.9,face="plain",family="Times"),
axis.text.x = element_text(size=10,angle=0,hjust=.5,vjust=1.5,face="plain",family="Times"),
axis.text.y = element_text(size=10,angle=0,hjust=1,vjust=0,face="plain",family="Times"),
axis.ticks = element_line(size=0.3, linetype="solid"),
# axis.ticks = element_blank(),
axis.ticks.length = unit(.15,'cm'),
# axis.ticks.margin = unit(.1,'cm'),
# axis.text = element_text(margin=unit(.1,'cm')),
#--- legend ---#
legend.text = element_text(size=10,angle=0,hjust=0,vjust=0,face="plain",family="Times"),
legend.title = element_text(size=10,angle=0,hjust=0,vjust=0,face="plain",family="Times"),
legend.key.size = unit(0.5, "cm"),
#--- strip (for faceting) ---#
strip.text = element_text(size = 10,family="Times"),
#--- plot title ---#
plot.title=element_text(family="Times", face="bold", size=12),
#--- margin ---#
# plot.margin = margin(0, 0, 0, 0, "cm"),
#--- panel ---#
panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
panel.background = element_blank(),
panel.border = element_rect(fill=NA)
)
```
## Before you start {-}
In this chapter we learn the spatial interactions of a vector and raster dataset. We first look at how to crop (spatially subset) a raster dataset based on the geographic extent of a vector dataset. We then cover how to extract values from raster data for points and polygons. To be precise, here is what we mean by raster data extraction and what it does for points and polygons data:
+ **Points**: For each of the points, find which raster cell it is located within, and assign the value of the cell to the point.
+ **Polygons**: For each of the polygons, identify all the raster cells that intersect with the polygon, and assign a vector of the cell values to the polygon
This is probably the most important operation economists run on raster datasets.
We will show how we can use `terra::extract()` for both cases. But, we will also see that for polygons, `exact_extract()` from the `exactextractr` package is often considerably faster than `terra::extract()`.
Finally, you will see conversions between `Raster`$^*$ (`raster` package) objects and `SpatRaster` object (`terra` package) because of the incompatibility of object classes across the key packages. I believe that these hassles will go away soon when they start supporting each other.
### Direction for replication {-}
**Datasets**
All the datasets that you need to import are available [here](https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l84zfidaxmjrti9/AAB1GrDRoIlidJ3_zArMN24ua?dl=0). In this chapter, the path to files is set relative to my own working directory (which is hidden). To run the codes without having to mess with paths to the files, follow these steps:
+ set a folder (any folder) as the working directory using `setwd()`
+ create a folder called "Data" inside the folder designated as the working directory (if you have created a "Data" folder previously, skip this step)
+ download the pertinent datasets from [here](https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l84zfidaxmjrti9/AAB1GrDRoIlidJ3_zArMN24ua?dl=0)
+ place all the files in the downloaded folder in the "Data" folder
**Packages**
Run the following code to install or load (if already installed) the `pacman` package, and then install or load (if already installed) the listed package inside the `pacman::p_load()` function.
```{r Chap5_packages}
if (!require("pacman")) install.packages("pacman")
pacman::p_load(
terra, # handle raster data
raster, # handle raster data
exactextractr, # fast extractions
sf, # vector data operations
dplyr, # data wrangling
tidyr, # data wrangling
data.table, # data wrangling
prism, # download PRISM data
tictoc # timing codes
)
```
(**Important** as of 06//15/2020)
You can make `exactextractr` even faster by installing the most recent versions of the `raster` (which `exactextractr` partially depends on) and `exactextractr` packages available on their respective github pages as follows:
```{r , eval = F}
library(remotes)
install_github("isciences/exactextractr")
install_github("rspatial/raster")
```
This will alleviate the significant overhead associated with many `getValuesBlock()` calls from `exactextractr::exact_extract`, and makes it much faster. See some benchmarks [here](https://github.com/isciences/exactextractr/issues/34). But, the installation of this version of the `raster` package causes an error with `mapview()` function. Therefore, this book is compiled with the CRAN version of the `raster` package to make all the codes in this book run without errors. This of course means that the relative performance of `exact_extract()` over other options can be even more impressive than what you will see in this book.
## Cropping (Spatial subsetting) to the Area of Interest {#raster-crop}
Here we use PRISM maximum temperature (tmax) data as a raster dataset and Kansas county boundaries as a vector dataset.
Let's download the tmax data for July 1, 2018 (Figure \@ref(fig:prism-tmax-map)).
```{r prism_download, cache = F, results = "hide"}
#--- set the path to the folder to which you save the downloaded PRISM data ---#
# This code sets the current working directory as the designated folder
options(prism.path = "./Data")
#--- download PRISM precipitation data ---#
get_prism_dailys(
type = "tmax",
date = "2018-07-01",
keepZip = FALSE
)
#--- the file name of the PRISM data just downloaded ---#
prism_file <- "./Data/PRISM_tmax_stable_4kmD2_20180701_bil/PRISM_tmax_stable_4kmD2_20180701_bil.bil"
#--- read in the prism data ---#
prism_tmax_0701 <- raster(prism_file)
```
```{r prism-tmax-map, echo = F, fig.cap = "Map of PRISM tmax data on July 1, 2018"}
library(tmap)
tm_shape(prism_tmax_0701) +
tm_raster() +
tm_layout(frame = NA)
```
We now get Kansas county border data from the `tigris` package (Figure \@ref(fig:ks-county-map)) as `sf`.
```{r get_KS_county, cache = F, results = "hide"}
library(tigris)
#--- Kansas boundary (sf) ---#
KS_county_sf <- counties(state = "Kansas", cb = TRUE) %>%
#--- sp to sf ---#
st_as_sf() %>%
#--- transform using the CRS of the PRISM tmax data ---#
st_transform(projection(prism_tmax_0701))
```
```{r ks-county-map, echo = FALSE, fig.cap = "Kansas county boundaries"}
#--- gen map ---#
tm_shape(KS_county_sf) +
tm_polygons() +
tm_layout(
frame = NA
)
```
---
Sometimes, it is convenient to crop a raster layer to the specific area of interest so that you do not have to carry around unnecessary parts of the raster layer. Moreover, it takes less time to extract values from a raster layer when the size of the raster layer is smaller. You can crop a raster layer by using `raster::crop()`. It works like this:
```{r crop_syntax, eval = FALSE}
#--- syntax (NOT RUN) ---#
crop(raster object, geographic extent)
```
To find the geographic extent of a vector data, you can use `raster::extent()`.
```{r raster_extent_sf, cache = F}
KS_extent <- raster::extent(KS_county_sf)
```
As you can see, it consists of four points. Four pairs of these values (xmin, ymin), (xmin, ymax), (xmax, ymin), and (xmax, ymax) form a rectangle that encompasses the Kansas state boundary. We will crop the PRISM raster layer to the rectangle:
```{r crop_prism_to_KS, cache = F}
#--- crop the entire PRISM to its KS portion---#
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl <- crop(prism_tmax_0701, KS_extent)
```
The figure below (Figure \@ref(fig:prism-ks-viz)) shows the PRISM tmax raster data cropped to the geographic extent of Kansas. Notice that the cropped raster layer extends beyond the outer boundary of Kansas state boundary (it is a bit hard to see, but look at the upper right corner).
```{r prism-ks-viz, fig.cap = "PRISM tmax raster data cropped to the geographic extent of Kansas", echo = F}
tm_shape(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl) +
tm_raster() +
tm_shape(KS_county_sf) +
tm_polygons(alpha = 0)
```
<!--
You can mask the values (set values to NA) outside of the vectors data.
```{r mask_prism, eval = F}
#--- syntax ---#
mask(raster object, sf object)
#--- example ---#
masked_prism_IL <- mask(prism_for_IL, IL_county)
```
```{r mask_prism_run, echo = F, eval = F}
#--- example ---#
masked_prism_IL <- mask(prism_for_IL, IL_county)
```
```{r prism_ks_masked_viz, eval = F}
tm_shape(masked_prism_IL) +
tm_raster() +
tm_shape(IL_county) +
tm_polygons(alpha = 0)
```
-->
## Extracting Values from Raster Layers for Vector Data
In this section, we will learn how to extract information from raster layers for spatial units represented as vector data (points and polygons). For the illustrations in this section, we use the following datasets:
+ Raster: PRISM tmax data cropped to Kansas state border for 07/01/2018 (obtained in \@ref(raster-crop)) and 07/02/2018 (downloaded below)
+ Polygons: Kansas county boundaries (obtained in \@ref(raster-crop))
+ Points: Irrigation wells in Kansas (imported below)
**PRISM tmax data for 07/02/2018**
```{r download_07022018, cache = F, results = "hide"}
#--- download PRISM precipitation data ---#
get_prism_dailys(
type = "tmax",
date = "2018-07-02",
keepZip = FALSE
)
#--- the file name of the PRISM data just downloaded ---#
prism_file <- "Data/PRISM_tmax_stable_4kmD2_20180702_bil/PRISM_tmax_stable_4kmD2_20180702_bil.bil"
#--- read in the prism data and crop it to Kansas state border ---#
prism_tmax_0702_KS_sr <- rast(prism_file) %>%
terra::crop(KS_extent)
```
**Irrigation wells in Kansas:**
```{r import_KS_wells}
#--- read in the KS points data ---#
(
KS_wells <- readRDS("./Data/Chap_5_wells_KS.rds")
)
```
---
Here is how the wells are spatially distributed over the PRISM grids and Kansas county borders (Figure \@ref(fig:tmax-prism-wells)):
```{r tmax-prism-wells, fig.cap = "Map of Kansas county borders, irrigation wells, and PRISM tmax", echo = F}
tm_shape(raster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr)) +
tm_raster(title = "tmax", alpha = 0.7) +
tm_shape(KS_county_sf) +
tm_polygons(alpha = 0) +
tm_shape(KS_wells) +
tm_symbols(size = 0.02) +
tm_layout(
frame = FALSE,
legend.outside = TRUE,
legend.outside.position = "bottom"
)
```
### Points
You can extract values from raster layers to points using `terra::extract()`. `terra::extract()` finds which raster cell each of the points is located within and assigns the value of the cell to the point. One complication that we have to deal with at the moment is the fact that `terra` does not support `sf` yet. However, `terra::extract()` accepts a longitude and latitude matrix. Therefore, the following works:^[I believe this issue will be resolved soon and you can just supply an `sf` object instead of coordinates.]
```{r eval = F}
#--- syntax (NOT RUN) ---#
terra::extract(raster object, st_coordinates(sf object))
```
Let's extract tmax values from the PRISM tmax layer (`prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl`) to the irrigation wells:
Since `prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl` is a `RasterLayer`, let's first convert it into a `SpatRaster` object.
```{r rl-to-sr}
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr <- rast(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl)
```
```{r extract_tmax}
#--- extract tmax values ---#
tmax_from_prism <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr, st_coordinates(KS_wells))
#--- take a look ---#
head(tmax_from_prism)
```
`terra::extract()` returns the extracted values as a vector when the raster object is single-layer raster data. Since the order of the values are consistent with the order of the observations in the points data, you can simply assign the vector as a new variable of the points data as follows:
```{r, cache=TRUE}
KS_wells$tmax_07_01 <- tmax_from_prism
```
Extracting values from a multi-layer `SpatRaster` works the same way. Here, we combine `prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr` and `prism_tmax_0702_KS_sr` to create a multi-layer `SpatRaster`.
```{r extract_tmax_run_stack}
#--- create a multi-layer SpatRaster ---#
prism_tmax_stack <- c(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr, prism_tmax_0702_KS_sr)
#--- extract tmax values ---#
tmax_from_prism_stack <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_stack, st_coordinates(KS_wells))
#--- take a look ---#
head(tmax_from_prism_stack)
```
Instead of a vector, the returned object is a matrix with each of the raster layers forming a column.
### Polygons (`terra` way)
**Caution:** Recently, `terra::extract()` crashed R sessions on RStudio several times when I tried to extract values from a large raster dataset (1.6 GB) for polygons. I did not see any problem when extracting for points data even if the raster data is very large, For now, I recommend `exact_extract()` to extract values for polygons, which is detailed in the next section. `exact_extract()` is faster for a large raster dataset anyway.
Remember that the `terra` packages does not support an `sf` object yet. So, an `sf` object of polygons needs to be converted to a `SpatVector` object before we use any functions from the `terra` packages.^[See Chapter \@ref(raster-basics) to learn what `SpatVector` is and how to convert `sf` to `SpatRaster`.]
```{r convert-sv}
#--- Kansas boundary (SpatVector) ---#
KS_county_sv <- KS_county_sf %>%
#--- convert to a SpatVector object ---#
as(., "Spatial") %>% vect()
```
You can use the same `terra::extract()` function to extract values from a raster layer for polygons. For each of the polygons, it will identify all the raster cells whose center lies inside the polygon and assign the vector of values of the cells to the polygon (You can change this to the cells that intersect with polygons using the `touch = TRUE` option).
```{r terra_extract_polygon}
#--- extract values from the raster for each county ---#
tmax_by_county <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr, KS_county_sv)
#--- take a look at the first 2 elements of the list ---#
tmax_by_county[1:2]
```
`terra::extract()` returns a list, where its $i$th element corresponds to the $i$th row of observation in the polygon data (`KS_county_sv`). Each of the list elements is also a list, and the list has a vector of extracted values for the corresponding polygon.
```{r tmax_for_one_county}
#--- see the first element of the list ---#
tmax_by_county[[1]]
#--- check the class ---#
tmax_by_county[[1]] %>% class()
```
In order to make the results usable, you can process them to get a single `data.frame`, taking advantage of `dplyr::bind_rows()` to combine the list of the datasets into one dataset. In doing so, you can use `.id` option to create a new identifier column that links each row to its original data (`data.table` users can use `rbindlist()` with the `idcol` option).
```{r tmax_for_one_county_to_df}
(
tmax_by_county_df <- tmax_by_county %>%
#--- apply unlist to the lists to have vectors as the list elements ---#
lapply(unlist) %>%
#--- convert vectors to data.frames ---#
lapply(as_tibble) %>%
#--- combine the list of data.frames ---#
bind_rows(., .id = "rowid") %>%
#--- rename the value variable ---#
rename(tmax = value)
)
```
Note that `rowid` represents the row number of polygons in `KS_county_sv`. Now, we can easily summarize the data by polygon (county). For example, the code below finds a simple average of tmax by county.
```{r mean_tmax}
tmax_by_county_df %>%
group_by(rowid) %>%
summarize(tmax = mean(tmax))
```
For `data.table` users, here is how you can do the same:
```{r data_table_way}
tmax_by_county %>%
#--- apply unlist to the lists to have vectors as the list elements ---#
lapply(unlist) %>%
#--- convert vectors to data.frames ---#
lapply(data.table) %>%
#--- combine the list ---#
rbindlist(., idcol = "rowid") %>%
#--- rename the value variable ---#
setnames("V1", "tmax") %>%
#--- find the mean of tmax ---#
.[, .(tmax = mean(tmax)), by = rowid]
```
---
Extracting values from a multi-layer raster data works exactly the same way except that data processing after the value extraction is slightly more complicated.
```{r terra_exatrac_from_stack_run}
#--- extract from a multi-layer raster object ---#
tmax_by_county_from_stack <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_stack, KS_county_sv)
#--- take a look at the first element ---#
tmax_by_county_from_stack[[1]]
```
Just like the single-layer case, $i$th element of the list corresponds to $i$th polygon. However, each element of the list has two lists of extracted values because we are extracting from a two-layer raster object. This makes it a bit complicated to process them to have nicely-formatted data. The following code transform the list to a single `data.frame`:
```{r process_eval_stack}
#--- extraction from a multi-layer raster object ---#
tmax_long_from_stack <- tmax_by_county_from_stack %>%
lapply(., function(x) bind_rows(lapply(x, as_tibble), .id = "layer")) %>%
bind_rows(., .id = "rowid")
#--- take a look ---#
head(tmax_long_from_stack)
```
Note that this code works for a raster object with any number of layers including the single-layer case we saw above.
We can then summarize the extracted data by polygon and raster layer.
```{r mean_tmax_layer_county}
tmax_long_from_stack %>%
group_by(rowid, layer) %>%
summarize(tmax = mean(value))
```
Here is the `data.table` way:
```{r process_eval_stack_dt}
(
tmax_by_county_layer <- tmax_by_county_from_stack %>%
lapply(., function(x) rbindlist(lapply(x, data.table), idcol = "layer")) %>%
rbindlist(., idcol = "rowid") %>%
.[, .(tmax = mean(V1)), by = .(rowid, layer)]
)
```
### Polygons (`exactextractr` way)
`exact_extract()` function from the `exactextractr` package is a faster alternative than `terra::extract()` for large raster data as we confirm later (`exact_extract()` does not work with points data at the moment).^[See [here](https://github.com/isciences/exactextract) for how it does extraction tasks differently from other major GIS software.] `exact_extract()` also provides a coverage fraction value for each of the cell-polygon intersections. However, as mentioned in Chapter \@ref(raster-basics), it only works with `Raster`$^*$ objects. So, we first need to convert a `SpatRaster` object to a `Raster`$^*$ object. The syntax of `exact_extract()` is very much similar to `terra::extract()`.
```{r eval = FALSE}
#--- syntax (NOT RUN) ---#
exact_extract(raster, sf)
```
So, to get tmax values from the PRISM raster layer for Kansas county polygons, the following does the job:
```{r exact_extract, eval = F}
#--- convert to a RasterLayer ---#
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl <- raster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr)
library("exactextractr")
#--- extract values from the raster for each county ---#
tmax_by_county <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl, KS_county_sf)
#--- take a look at the first 6 rows of the first two list elements ---#
tmax_by_county[1:2] %>% lapply(function(x) head(x))
```
```{r exact_extract_run, echo = F, results = "hide"}
library("exactextractr")
#--- extract values from the raster for each county ---#
tmax_by_county <- exact_extract(raster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr), KS_county_sf)
```
```{r show_the_results, echo = F}
#--- convert to a RasterLayer ---#
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl <- raster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr)
#--- take a look at the first 6 rows of the first two list elements ---#
tmax_by_county[1:2] %>% lapply(function(x) head(x))
```
`exact_extract()` returns a list, where its $i$th element corresponds to the $i$th row of observation in the polygon data (`KS_county_sf`). For each element of the list, you see `value` and `coverage_fraction`. `value` is the tmax value of the intersecting raster cells, and `coverage_fraction` is the fraction of the intersecting area relative to the full raster grid, which can help find coverage-weighted summary of the extracted values.
```{r combine_after_ee}
#--- combine ---#
tmax_combined <- bind_rows(tmax_by_county, .id = "id")
#--- take a look ---#
head(tmax_combined)
```
We can now summarize the data by `id`. Here, we calculate coverage-weighted mean of tmax.
```{r transform_after_ee}
tmax_by_id <- tmax_combined %>%
#--- convert from character to numeric ---#
mutate(id = as.numeric(id)) %>%
#--- group summary ---#
group_by(id) %>%
summarise(tmax = sum(value * coverage_fraction) / sum(coverage_fraction))
#--- take a look ---#
head(tmax_by_id)
```
Remember that `id` values are row numbers in the polygon data (`KS_county_sf`). So, we can assign the tmax values to KS_county_sf as follows:
```{r asign_values_after_ee}
KS_county_sf$tmax_07_01 <- tmax_by_id$tmax
```
---
Extracting values from `RasterStack` works in exactly the same manner as `RasterLayer`. Do not forget that you need to use `stack()` instead of `raster()` to convert a multi-layer `SpatRaster` to `RasterStack`.
```{r exatrac_from_stack_run}
tmax_by_county_stack <- stack(prism_tmax_stack) %>% # convert to RasterStack
#--- extract from a stack ---#
exact_extract(., KS_county_sf, progress = F)
#--- take a look at the first 6 lines of the first element---#
tmax_by_county_stack[[1]] %>% head()
```
As you can see above, `exact_extract()` appends additional columns for additional layers, unlike the results of `terra::extract()` that creates additional lists for additional layers. This makes the post-extraction processing much simpler.
```{r combine_them}
#--- combine them ---#
tmax_all_combined <- tmax_by_county_stack %>%
bind_rows(.id = "id")
#--- take a look ---#
head(tmax_all_combined)
```
In order to find the coverage-weighted tmax by date, you can first pivot it to a long format using `dplyr::pivot_longer()`.
```{r pivot_to_longer}
#--- pivot to a longer format ---#
(
tmax_long <- pivot_longer(
tmax_all_combined,
-c(id, coverage_fraction),
names_to = "date",
values_to = "tmax"
)
)
```
And then find coverage-weighted tmax by date:
```{r dplyr_way_tmax_cov}
(
tmax_long %>%
group_by(id, date) %>%
summarize(tmax = sum(tmax * coverage_fraction) / sum(coverage_fraction))
)
```
For `data.table` users, this does the same:
```{r datatable_way_tmax_cov}
(
tmax_all_combined %>%
data.table() %>%
melt(id.var = c("id", "coverage_fraction")) %>%
.[, .(tmax = sum(value * coverage_fraction) / sum(coverage_fraction)), by = .(id, variable)]
)
```
## Extraction speed comparison {#extract-speed}
Here we compare the extraction speed of `raster::extract()`, `terra::extract()`, and `exact_extract()`.
### Points: `terra::extract()` and `raster::extract()`
`exact_extract()` uses C++ as the backend. Therefore, it is considerably faster than `raster::extract()`.
```{r points_extraction_comp}
#--- terra ---#
tic()
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr, st_coordinates(KS_wells))
toc()
#--- raster ---#
tic()
temp <- raster::extract(raster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr), KS_wells)
toc()
```
As you can see, `terra::extract()` is much faster. The time differential between the two packages can be substantial as the raster data becomes larger.
### Polygons: `exact_extract()`, `terra::extract()`, and `raster::extract()`
`terra::extract()` is faster than `exact_extract()` for a relatively small raster data. Let's time them and see the difference.
```{r extract_from_polygons}
library(tictoc)
#--- terra extract ---#
tic()
terra_extract_temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr, KS_county_sv, progress = FALSE)
toc()
#--- exact extract ---#
tic()
exact_extract_temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
toc()
#--- raster::extract ---#
tic()
raster_extract_temp <- raster::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl, KS_county_sf)
toc()
```
As you can see, `raster::extract()` is by far the slowest. `terra::extract()` is faster than `exact_extract()`. However, once the raster data becomes larger (or spatially finer), then `exact_extact()` starts to shine.
---
Let's disaggregate the prism data by a factor of 10 to create a much larger raster data.^[We did not introduce this function as it is very rare that you need this function in research projects.]
```{r prism_disaggregate}
#--- disaggregate ---#
(
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10 <- terra::disaggregate(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr, fact = 10)
)
#--- convert the disaggregated PRISM data to RasterLayer ---#
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10 <- raster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10)
```
The disaggregated PRISM data now has 10 times more rows and columns (see below).
```{r dimensions}
#--- original ---#
dim(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr)
#--- disaggregated ---#
dim(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10)
```
---
Now, let's compare `terra::extrct()` and `exact_extrct()` using the disaggregated data.
```{r extract_from_polygons_comp_2}
#--- terra extract ---#
tic()
terra_extract_temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, KS_county_sv)
toc()
#--- exact extract ---#
tic()
exact_extract_temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
toc()
```
As you can see, `exact_extract()` is considerably faster. The difference in time becomes even more pronounced as the size of the raster data becomes larger and the number of polygons are greater. The time difference of several seconds seem nothing, but imagine processing PRISM files for the entire US over 20 years, then you would appreciate the speed of `exact_extract()`.
### Single-layer vs multi-layer
Pretend that you have five dates of PRISM tmax data (here we repeat the same file five times) and would like to extract values from all of them. Extracting values from a multi-layer raster objects (`RasterStack` for `raster` package) takes less time than extracting values from the individual layers one at a time. This can be observed below.
---
**`terra::extract()`**
```{r write_raster_prism_10, echo = F}
# terra::writeRaster(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, "./Data/prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10.tif", format = "GTiff", overwrite = TRUE)
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10 <- rast("./Data/prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10.tif")
```
```{r compare_speed_te}
#--- extract from 5 layers one at a time ---#
tic()
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, KS_county_sv)
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, KS_county_sv)
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, KS_county_sv)
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, KS_county_sv)
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10, KS_county_sv)
toc()
#--- extract from a 5-layer stack ---#
prism_tmax_ml_5 <- c(
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_sr_10
)
tic()
temp <- terra::extract(prism_tmax_ml_5, KS_county_sv)
toc()
```
---
**`exact_extract()`**
```{r compare_speed_ee}
#--- extract from 5 layers one at a time ---#
tic()
temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
toc()
#--- extract from from a 5-layer stack ---#
prism_tmax_stack_5 <- stack(
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10,
prism_tmax_0701_KS_rl_10
)
tic()
temp <- exact_extract(prism_tmax_stack_5, KS_county_sf, progress = FALSE)
toc()
```
The reduction in computation time for both methods makes sense. Since both layers have exactly the same geographic extent and resolution, finding the polygons-cells correspondence is done once and then it can be used repeatedly across the layers for the multi-layer `SparRaster` and `RasterStack`. This clearly suggests that when you are processing many layers of the same spatial resolution and extent, you should first stack them and then extract values at the same time instead of processing them one by one as long as your memory allows you to do so.
<!-- There is much more to discuss about the computation speed of raster data extraction for polygons. For those who are interested in this topic, go to Chapter \@ref(EE). -->