You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are trying to leverage the part library of one of the two open source EDA
software. Please give suggestion concerning simplicity, easy-to-draw and
easy-to-parse.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 11 Apr 2011 at 2:01
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a very competitive function of Fritzing that it can output the
schematic file as a an XML, which is very easy to parse. Furthermore, the parts
library is also written in XML. Thus, after communicating with the library
group and the Qt group, we decide to leverage the file format of Fritzing.
Thanks for your report very much anyway.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 11 Apr 2011 at 2:01The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: