Skip to content

Use an AtomicPool for Connections within s2n-tls #1

@mookums

Description

@mookums

Mostly just title. We currently have to mutex during connection creation (because the set_config method in s2n is not thread-safe). Regardless, it would generally be better to pool connections together so we can use *_wipe instead of *_free and save on allocations.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    s2n-tlsRelating to s2n-tls

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions