-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathchapter-3.aux
207 lines (207 loc) · 33 KB
/
chapter-3.aux
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
\relax
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {3}Chapter Three}{19}{chapter.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3.1}Event Comparisons}{19}{section.3.1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.1}18 January 2014 - Synoptic}{19}{subsection.3.1.1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.1}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 18 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{20}{figure.caption.14}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20140118}{{3.1}{20}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 18 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.14}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.2}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 18 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{20}{figure.caption.15}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20140118}{{3.2}{20}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 18 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.15}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20140118}{{3.3a}{21}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.16}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20140118}{{a}{21}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.16}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20140118}{{3.3b}{21}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted\relax }{figure.caption.16}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20140118}{{b}{21}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted\relax }{figure.caption.16}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.3}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 18 January 2014. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{21}{figure.caption.16}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20140118}{{3.3}{21}{Direct comparisons for 18 January 2014. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.16}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.4}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{22}{figure.caption.17}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20140118}{{3.4}{22}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.17}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.2}23 January 2014 - Lake-Effect}{22}{subsection.3.1.2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.5}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 23 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{23}{figure.caption.18}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20140123}{{3.5}{23}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 23 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.18}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.6}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 23 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{23}{figure.caption.19}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20140123}{{3.6}{23}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 23 January 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.19}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20140123}{{3.7a}{24}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.20}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20140123}{{a}{24}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.20}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20140123}{{3.7b}{24}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.20}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20140123}{{b}{24}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.20}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.7}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 23 January 2014. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{24}{figure.caption.20}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20140123}{{3.7}{24}{Direct comparisons for 23 January 2014. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.20}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.8}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red. \relax }}{25}{figure.caption.21}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20140123}{{3.8}{25}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red. \relax }{figure.caption.21}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.3}1 February 2014 - Synoptic}{25}{subsection.3.1.3}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20140201}{{3.11a}{26}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.24}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20140201}{{a}{26}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.24}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20140201}{{3.11b}{26}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.24}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20140201}{{b}{26}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.24}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.11}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 1 February 2014. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{26}{figure.caption.24}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20140201}{{3.11}{26}{Direct comparisons for 1 February 2014. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.24}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.9}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 1 February 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{27}{figure.caption.22}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20140201}{{3.9}{27}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 1 February 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.22}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.10}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 1 February 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{27}{figure.caption.23}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20140201}{{3.10}{27}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 1 February 2014. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.23}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.12}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{28}{figure.caption.25}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20140201}{{3.12}{28}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.25}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.4}6 January 2015 - Lake-Effect}{28}{subsection.3.1.4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.13}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 6 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{29}{figure.caption.26}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20150106}{{3.13}{29}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 6 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.26}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.14}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 6 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{29}{figure.caption.27}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20150106}{{3.14}{29}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 6 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.27}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20150106}{{3.15a}{30}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20150106}{{a}{30}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20150106}{{3.15b}{30}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20150106}{{b}{30}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.15}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 6 January 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{30}{figure.caption.28}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20150106}{{3.15}{30}{Direct comparisons for 6 January 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.16}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{31}{figure.caption.29}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20150106}{{3.16}{31}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.29}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.5}7 January 2015 - Synoptic}{31}{subsection.3.1.5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.17}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 7 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{32}{figure.caption.30}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20150107}{{3.17}{32}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 7 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.30}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.18}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 7 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{32}{figure.caption.31}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20150107}{{3.18}{32}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 7 January 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.31}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20150107}{{3.19a}{33}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.32}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20150107}{{a}{33}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.32}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20150107}{{3.19b}{33}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.32}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20150107}{{b}{33}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.32}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.19}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 7 January 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{33}{figure.caption.32}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20150107}{{3.19}{33}{Direct comparisons for 7 January 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.32}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.20}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{34}{figure.caption.33}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20150107}{{3.20}{34}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.33}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.6}6 February 2015 - Synoptic}{34}{subsection.3.1.6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.21}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 6 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{35}{figure.caption.34}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20150206}{{3.21}{35}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 6 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.34}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.22}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 6 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{35}{figure.caption.35}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20150206}{{3.22}{35}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 6 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.35}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20150206}{{3.23a}{36}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.36}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20150206}{{a}{36}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.36}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20150206}{{3.23b}{36}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.36}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20150206}{{b}{36}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.36}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.23}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 6 February 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{36}{figure.caption.36}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20150206}{{3.23}{36}{Direct comparisons for 6 February 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.36}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.24}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{37}{figure.caption.37}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20150206}{{3.24}{37}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.37}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.7}14 February 2015 - Lake-Effect}{37}{subsection.3.1.7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.25}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 14 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{38}{figure.caption.38}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20150214}{{3.25}{38}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 14 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.38}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.26}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 14 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{38}{figure.caption.39}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20150214}{{3.26}{38}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 14 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.39}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20150214}{{3.27a}{39}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.40}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20150214}{{a}{39}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.40}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20150214}{{3.27b}{39}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.40}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20150214}{{b}{39}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.40}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.27}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 14 February 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{39}{figure.caption.40}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20150214}{{3.27}{39}{Direct comparisons for 14 February 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.40}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.8}18 February 2015 - Lake-Effect}{40}{subsection.3.1.8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.29}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 18 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{40}{figure.caption.42}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20150218}{{3.29}{40}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 18 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.42}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.28}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{41}{figure.caption.41}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20150214}{{3.28}{41}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.41}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.30}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 18 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{41}{figure.caption.43}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20150218}{{3.30}{41}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 18 February 2015. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.43}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20150218}{{3.31a}{42}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.44}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20150218}{{a}{42}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.44}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20150218}{{3.31b}{42}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.44}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20150218}{{b}{42}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.44}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.31}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 18 February 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{42}{figure.caption.44}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20150218}{{3.31}{42}{Direct comparisons for 18 February 2015. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.44}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.32}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{43}{figure.caption.45}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20150218}{{3.32}{43}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.45}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.9}10 February 2016 - Lake-Effect}{43}{subsection.3.1.9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.33}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 10 February 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{44}{figure.caption.46}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20160210}{{3.33}{44}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 10 February 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.46}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.34}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 10 February 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{44}{figure.caption.47}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20160210}{{3.34}{44}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 10 February 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.47}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20160210}{{3.35a}{45}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.48}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20160210}{{a}{45}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.48}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20160210}{{3.35b}{45}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.48}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20160210}{{b}{45}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.48}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.35}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 10 February 2016. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{45}{figure.caption.48}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20160210}{{3.35}{45}{Direct comparisons for 10 February 2016. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.48}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.36}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }}{46}{figure.caption.49}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20160210}{{3.36}{46}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR (right). Bias is calculated by subtracting the gridded, bias-adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red.\relax }{figure.caption.49}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1.10}15 December 2016 - Synoptic}{46}{subsection.3.1.10}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.37}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 15 December 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{47}{figure.caption.50}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_ref_20161215}{{3.37}{47}{Gridded $Z_{eH}$ comparison for 15 December 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.50}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.38}{\ignorespaces Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 15 December 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }}{47}{figure.caption.51}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_20161215}{{3.38}{47}{Gridded $Z_{DR}$ comparison for 15 December 2016. Time-average of all admitted scans.\relax }{figure.caption.51}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_ref_20161215}{{3.39a}{48}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.52}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_ref_20161215}{{a}{48}{$Z_{eH}$ (dBZ) with a orthonormal linear regression.\relax }{figure.caption.52}{}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_zdr_20161215}{{3.39b}{48}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.52}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:scatter_zdr_20161215}{{b}{48}{$Z_{DR}$ (dB) with a variance-weighted orthonormal linear regression and percentiles plotted.\relax }{figure.caption.52}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.39}{\ignorespaces Direct comparisons for 15 December 2016. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }}{48}{figure.caption.52}}
\newlabel{fig:scatter_20161215}{{3.39}{48}{Direct comparisons for 15 December 2016. Dataset includes all admitted grid cells.\relax }{figure.caption.52}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.40}{\ignorespaces Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR, determined by subtracting the gridded, bias adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red. \relax }}{49}{figure.caption.53}}
\newlabel{fig:hist_20161215}{{3.40}{49}{Histograms of $Z_{DR}$ (left), $Z_{DR}$ bias at CWKR, determined by subtracting the gridded, bias adjusted $Z_{DR}$ at KBUF from the $Z_{DR}$ at CWKR. Both datasets use the 50th percentile as a threshold. The modal bin is shaded red. \relax }{figure.caption.53}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3.2}$Z_{eH}$ Subset Comparisons}{49}{section.3.2}}
\newlabel{fig:ref_synoptic}{{3.41a}{50}{subset of synoptic snow events\relax }{figure.caption.54}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ref_synoptic}{{a}{50}{subset of synoptic snow events\relax }{figure.caption.54}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ref_lake_effect}{{3.41b}{50}{subset of lake-effect snow events\relax }{figure.caption.54}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ref_lake_effect}{{b}{50}{subset of lake-effect snow events\relax }{figure.caption.54}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.41}{\ignorespaces Scatter-plots of CWKR versus KBUF grid analyzed reflectivity, with Kernel Density Estimation shading. The red line is an Orthonormal Linear Regression, with a black identity line.\relax }}{50}{figure.caption.54}}
\newlabel{fig:ref_scatter}{{3.41}{50}{Scatter-plots of CWKR versus KBUF grid analyzed reflectivity, with Kernel Density Estimation shading. The red line is an Orthonormal Linear Regression, with a black identity line.\relax }{figure.caption.54}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3.3}Constrained $Z_{DR}$}{51}{section.3.3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3.1}Unbiased $Z_{DR}$ Cases}{51}{subsection.3.3.1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.1.1}18 January 2014}{51}{subsubsection.3.3.1.1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.42}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 18 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }}{52}{figure.caption.55}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20140118}{{3.42}{52}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 18 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }{figure.caption.55}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.1.2}23 January 2014}{52}{subsubsection.3.3.1.2}}
\citation{Hassan2017}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.43}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 23 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }}{53}{figure.caption.56}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20140123}{{3.43}{53}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 23 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }{figure.caption.56}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.1.3}6 January 2015}{53}{subsubsection.3.3.1.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.44}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 6 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }}{54}{figure.caption.57}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20150106}{{3.44}{54}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 6 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }{figure.caption.57}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.1.4}7 January 2015}{54}{subsubsection.3.3.1.4}}
\citation{Hosler1957}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.45}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 7 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }}{55}{figure.caption.58}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20150107}{{3.45}{55}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 7 January 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }{figure.caption.58}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.1.5}10 February 2016}{55}{subsubsection.3.3.1.5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.46}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 10 February 2016. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }}{56}{figure.caption.59}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20160210}{{3.46}{56}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 10 February 2016. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE.\relax }{figure.caption.59}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3.2}Biased $Z_{DR}$ Cases}{56}{subsection.3.3.2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.2.1}1 February 2014}{56}{subsubsection.3.3.2.1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.47}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 1 February 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points with above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }}{57}{figure.caption.60}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20140201}{{3.47}{57}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 1 February 2014. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points with above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }{figure.caption.60}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.2.2}6 February 2015}{57}{subsubsection.3.3.2.2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.48}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 6 February 2015. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }}{58}{figure.caption.61}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20150206}{{3.48}{58}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 6 February 2015. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }{figure.caption.61}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.2.3}14 February 2015}{58}{subsubsection.3.3.2.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.49}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 14 February 2015. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }}{59}{figure.caption.62}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20150214}{{3.49}{59}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 14 February 2015. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }{figure.caption.62}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.2.4}18 February 2015}{59}{subsubsection.3.3.2.4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.50}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 18 February 2015. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }}{60}{figure.caption.63}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20150218}{{3.50}{60}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 18 February 2015. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }{figure.caption.63}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.3.2.5}15 December 2016}{60}{subsubsection.3.3.2.5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3.51}{\ignorespaces Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 15 December 2016. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }}{61}{figure.caption.64}}
\newlabel{fig:grid_zdr_kde_20161215}{{3.51}{61}{Comparison of gridded $Z_{DR}$ with Gaussian ($\sigma =3$) smoothed contours of $Z_{eH}$ for 15 December 2016. $Z_{DR}$ is constrained by only including points above the 50th percentile KDE, and is bias-adjusted\relax }{figure.caption.64}{}}
\@setckpt{chapter-3}{
\setcounter{page}{62}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
\setcounter{enumi}{4}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{0}
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{0}
\setcounter{chapter}{3}
\setcounter{section}{3}
\setcounter{subsection}{2}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{5}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{51}
\setcounter{table}{0}
\setcounter{parentequation}{0}
\setcounter{Item}{4}
\setcounter{Hfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{bookmark@seq@number}{39}
\setcounter{ContinuedFloat}{0}
\setcounter{subfigure}{0}
\setcounter{subtable}{0}
\setcounter{float@type}{4}
\setcounter{NAT@ctr}{0}
\setcounter{section@level}{1}
}