You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was going to do a few PRs for the container resource. This is not on the base package so I have few questions.
Is it Ok from your perspective to add resources that are beyond the base package? ie: containers.
Is the Dev container ready with all the packages? if not should we added first? (assuming yes for the previous questions).
Happy coding!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
The situation with container support hasn't changed since #86. I think it is possible to add container support, as there are already a number of resources that cannot be covered by tests. And things are not bad so far.
Also at the time of my research there was no way to automatically install packages into a ROS test container. So I don't have a way to automatically build the required test container configuration at the time of docker image generation or add packages later during test preparation.
jlpedrosa
changed the title
Design/Plan for resources in "extra" packages
Enhance acceptance testing environment to enable resources in "extra" packages
Feb 14, 2024
@vaerh I've updated the description, to keep track of the depencency on extra packages if it makes sense. If you don't agree with the new approach, we can close it.
Hi team!
I was going to do a few PRs for the container resource. This is not on the base package so I have few questions.
Is it Ok from your perspective to add resources that are beyond the base package? ie: containers.
Is the Dev container ready with all the packages? if not should we added first? (assuming yes for the previous questions).
Happy coding!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: