You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
rng_fill/chacha8/2000000
time: [1.6929 ms 1.6940 ms 1.6951 ms]
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
2 (2.00%) low severe
1 (1.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
rng_fill/chacha12/2000000
time: [2.4556 ms 2.4581 ms 2.4606 ms]
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
rng_fill/chacha20/2000000
time: [3.9821 ms 3.9857 ms 3.9895 ms]
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
rng_fill/aes/2000000 time: [8.4624 ms 8.4707 ms 8.4792 ms]
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
rng_next_u64/chacha8 time: [8.0137 us 8.0212 us 8.0285 us]
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
rng_next_u64/chacha12 time: [11.055 us 11.065 us 11.076 us]
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
rng_next_u64/chacha20 time: [17.142 us 17.161 us 17.179 us]
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
5 (5.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
rng_next_u64/aes time: [36.918 us 36.950 us 36.983 us]
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
5 (5.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
Maybe this can be fixed by simply enabling a flag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mortendahl
changed the title
Performance on Apple M1
Investigate simple performance improvement for Apple M1
May 26, 2022
rng_fill/chacha8/2000000
time: [1.5236 ms 1.5249 ms 1.5263 ms]
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
rng_fill/chacha12/2000000
time: [2.2282 ms 2.2300 ms 2.2320 ms]
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
rng_fill/chacha20/2000000
time: [3.6580 ms 3.6617 ms 3.6656 ms]
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
rng_fill/aes/2000000 time: [225.40 us 225.76 us 226.14 us]
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
5 (5.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe
rng_next_u64/chacha8 time: [6.2238 us 6.2301 us 6.2366 us]
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild
rng_next_u64/chacha12 time: [9.0791 us 9.0910 us 9.1064 us]
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe
rng_next_u64/chacha20 time: [14.792 us 14.805 us 14.818 us]
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
rng_next_u64/aes time: [1.9284 us 1.9315 us 1.9346 us]
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
AES seems to be slower than ChaCha on Apple M1:
Maybe this can be fixed by simply enabling a flag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: