feat: Add platform-specific package manager contexts (Brew, Chocolatey, Winget) #438
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| name: Claude Code Review | |
| on: | |
| pull_request_target: | |
| types: [opened, synchronize] | |
| workflow_dispatch: | |
| inputs: | |
| pr_number: | |
| description: 'Pull Request number to review' | |
| required: true | |
| type: number | |
| jobs: | |
| external-review: | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| permissions: | |
| contents: read | |
| pull-requests: write | |
| id-token: write | |
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v6 | |
| with: | |
| fetch-depth: 1 | |
| - uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 | |
| with: | |
| claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }} | |
| github_token: ${{ secrets.PR_REVIEW }} | |
| prompt: | | |
| <task> | |
| Review PR #${{ inputs.pr_number || github.event.pull_request.number }} in ${{ github.repository }}. | |
| </task> | |
| <instructions> | |
| 1. Read CLAUDE.md to understand TUnit's critical rules | |
| 2. Run `gh pr diff ${{ inputs.pr_number || github.event.pull_request.number }}` to see changes | |
| 3. Run `gh pr view ${{ inputs.pr_number || github.event.pull_request.number }} --comments` to check previous review comments | |
| 4. Determine which TUnit rules apply based on files changed | |
| 5. Read any files needed to understand context before commenting | |
| Think carefully. Never speculate about code you haven't inspected. | |
| </instructions> | |
| <tunit_rules> | |
| Check which rules apply based on files modified: | |
| - IF changes touch TUnit.Core.SourceGenerator OR TUnit.Engine test discovery: | |
| → Verify dual-mode implementation (both paths must behave identically) | |
| - IF source generator output changed: | |
| → Verify .verified.txt snapshots updated (never .received.txt) | |
| - IF public API changed (TUnit.Core, TUnit.Engine, TUnit.Assertions): | |
| → Verify TUnit.PublicAPI snapshots updated | |
| - IF reflection is used: | |
| → Verify [DynamicallyAccessedMembers] annotations for AOT compatibility | |
| - IF changes touch hot paths (discovery, execution, data generation): | |
| → Flag unnecessary allocations or performance concerns | |
| ALWAYS block: Any use of Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestPlatform (VSTest) | |
| </tunit_rules> | |
| <review_focus> | |
| Flag only issues that matter: | |
| - Critical: Bugs, TUnit rule violations, security issues (injection, XSS, command injection, secrets in code) | |
| - Suggestions: Significantly better approaches (not minor preferences) | |
| DO NOT comment on: | |
| - Style handled by linters/formatters | |
| - Minor naming preferences | |
| - Self-explanatory code | |
| - Intentional design choices | |
| </review_focus> | |
| <output_format> | |
| ## Summary | |
| One sentence: what does this PR do? | |
| ## Critical Issues | |
| Blocking problems that must be fixed. If none: "None found ✅" | |
| ## Suggestions | |
| Optional improvements. If none, omit this section. | |
| ## Previous Review Status | |
| If previous comments exist: note which issues were addressed or remain open. | |
| If no previous comments: omit this section. | |
| ## Verdict | |
| ✅ **APPROVE** - No critical issues | |
| ⚠️ **REQUEST CHANGES** - Critical issues found | |
| 💬 **COMMENT** - Questions only, no blocking issues | |
| </output_format> | |
| Post your review using `gh pr comment ${{ inputs.pr_number || github.event.pull_request.number }} --body "YOUR_REVIEW"`. | |
| claude_args: '--allowed-tools "Read,Glob,Grep,Bash(gh issue view:*),Bash(gh search:*),Bash(gh issue list:*),Bash(gh pr comment:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr list:*)"' |