Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get score specific for runtime environments available #1533

Open
5 tasks
fridex opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 14 comments
Open
5 tasks

Get score specific for runtime environments available #1533

fridex opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 14 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/stack-guidance Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Stack Guidance. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@fridex
Copy link
Contributor

fridex commented Nov 3, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

As Thoth user, I would like to get information about the best runtime environment for my application. For this purpose, I would like to ask Thoth which runtime environment should I use for my specific set of requirements.

Describe the solution you'd like

Run multiple advisers at once, each differing in the runtime environment setup (e.g. different base image, different operating system, different Python interpreter version) but with the same requirements. Then, aggregate results of adviser runs and obtain information about the runtime environment which should be used based on the score - using map-reduce.

  • create a workflow that runs multiple advise workflows based on available runtime environments
  • create an aggregation task that is run once all the triggered workflows finish and aggregates score computed
  • the task reports which runtime environment is the most suitable for running the given application stack
  • create a flag on advise endpoint that runs the extended workflow if no runtime environment configuration is supplied
  • create an integration test that verifies correctness of the workflow
@fridex fridex added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Nov 3, 2020
@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Apr 17, 2021

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 17, 2021
@fridex
Copy link
Contributor Author

fridex commented Apr 19, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

We can do this once the recommendations for one runtime environment stabilize. It will be just a manner of providing a workflow for this with a task that will aggregate results of multiple workflows created.

@sesheta sesheta removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 19, 2021
@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Apr 19, 2021

@fridex do we have an issue to create the workflow? if not, could you please create it? thx! 🙏

@fridex
Copy link
Contributor Author

fridex commented Apr 19, 2021

@fridex do we have an issue to create the workflow? if not, could you please create it? thx!

This user story will deserve multiple changes - I've added a list of items that should be done not to create more issues for the same thing. I think we can split the issue items once we decide to work on this.

@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Jul 15, 2021

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten

@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jul 15, 2021
@fridex
Copy link
Contributor Author

fridex commented Jul 15, 2021

Still relevant, see also linked issues.

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@sesheta sesheta removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jul 15, 2021
@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Aug 24, 2021

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten

@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Aug 24, 2021
@fridex
Copy link
Contributor Author

fridex commented Aug 24, 2021

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/reopen
/triage accepted

@sesheta sesheta added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels Aug 24, 2021
@pacospace pacospace added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Sep 1, 2021
@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Oct 1, 2021

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

@sesheta sesheta closed this as completed Oct 1, 2021
@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Oct 1, 2021

@sesheta: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@pacospace pacospace reopened this Oct 8, 2021
@codificat
Copy link
Member

/priority important-longterm
/remove-priority backlog

@sesheta sesheta added priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. labels Nov 23, 2021
@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Mar 4, 2022

@fridex is this a feature we want to push for MVP?

@fridex
Copy link
Contributor Author

fridex commented Mar 4, 2022

It might be a good idea to postpone it.

@goern goern added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. labels Sep 5, 2022
@harshad16 harshad16 moved this to 🆕 New in Planning Board Oct 7, 2022
@codificat
Copy link
Member

/sig stack-guidance

@sesheta sesheta added the sig/stack-guidance Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Stack Guidance. label Jan 30, 2023
@goern goern removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jan 30, 2023
@goern goern moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in Planning Board Jan 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/stack-guidance Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Stack Guidance. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants