Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add HL7 and CLAD information to the TISLab research page #82

Open
tursynay opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Add HL7 and CLAD information to the TISLab research page #82

tursynay opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tursynay
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Chris, thanks for offering to add sections on HL7 and CLAD to the research page: https://tislab.org/research/

@chrisroederucdenver
Copy link
Member

I have a basic CLAD section in a branch. I lifted text and a graphic from a few sites:

I can create a PR, but would love to test the rendered HTML from markdown and I don't know how to do it. I've tried to render it with pandoc, but it doesn't get everything. Can you help in that regard? Or just push, view, fix and push again?

@chrisroederucdenver
Copy link
Member

HL7 might be tricky. We have projects that involve HL7 FHIR, and we are involved in (if you don't know) workgroups for phenopackets, fhir-to-omop by way of Davera Gabriel at JHU. There is also the TIMS/Hot-ecosystem effort at building a terminology server that aims to be available through FHIR and use a FHIR server called HAPI. It may involve a workgroup with aims to add terminology server capability to the FHIR standard. Point is, they are different efforts rather than a single on like most things listed on the Research page. Also, except for the phenopackets one, their funding etc. isn't as clear to me. I think this would tie into Melissa's comment about programs vs grants. An HL7 program might include those efforts and then be funded by various grants???

There's been change in most of those I need to track down yet, but I'm curious what you @tursynay, Anita or @mellybelly or others think about these with regard to the programs idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants