You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@postfalk - when I do pass in a Cuddelink email with attached images, the self.get_extra_exif() method correctly extracts the EXIF from the image, but the self.format_and_merge_exif_data() then returns an empty dict. I'm sure this is something minor & I can look into it an fix it, but I'm concerned why the cameras test wouldn't have caught this.
Also - mind if I rename the get_extra_exif method? I consider EXIF data the metadata that we extract directly from the image file using Exiftool; the "extra" stuff is more what we extract from other parts of the email (body, subject line, etc) and then write to the images' EXIF data.
Here's an example of the extra_exif returned by an image:
@postfalk - when I do pass in a Cuddelink email with attached images, the
self.get_extra_exif()
method correctly extracts the EXIF from the image, but theself.format_and_merge_exif_data()
then returns an empty dict. I'm sure this is something minor & I can look into it an fix it, but I'm concerned why the cameras test wouldn't have caught this.Also - mind if I rename the
get_extra_exif
method? I consider EXIF data the metadata that we extract directly from the image file using Exiftool; the "extra" stuff is more what we extract from other parts of the email (body, subject line, etc) and then write to the images' EXIF data.Here's an example of the
extra_exif
returned by an image:and
self.format_and_merge_exif_data(extra_data=extra_exif)
for that same image returns an empty dict{}
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: