Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

define consensus protocol #21

Open
tomarrell opened this issue Jan 8, 2020 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #100
Open

define consensus protocol #21

tomarrell opened this issue Jan 8, 2020 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #100
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or enhancement help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone

Comments

@tomarrell
Copy link
Owner

tomarrell commented Jan 8, 2020

The database needs to handle multiple nodes over a network.

Prior art in this area is exists in https://github.com/rqlite/rqlite and can possibly be used as inspiration

We are looking for something which can exist as a barebones implementation to begin with, which is well isolated from the rest of the system to allow for further extension.

@tomarrell tomarrell changed the title consensus: implement Raft consensus consensus: implement Raft Jan 8, 2020
@tomarrell tomarrell added feature New feature or enhancement help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jan 8, 2020
@tomarrell tomarrell changed the title consensus: implement Raft implement consensus protocol (Raft) Jan 8, 2020
@tomarrell tomarrell changed the title implement consensus protocol (Raft) define consensus protocol Jan 8, 2020
@tsatke tsatke assigned tomarrell and tsatke and unassigned tsatke Feb 18, 2020
@tsatke tsatke added this to the v0.0.1 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@SUMUKHA-PK SUMUKHA-PK linked a pull request Mar 29, 2020 that will close this issue
@SUMUKHA-PK SUMUKHA-PK self-assigned this Apr 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or enhancement help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants