Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hey @JRGalvan, we actually had @jussisaurio do something similar before (#371). While I am open to having something like that in the tree, I don't think it should be the default one because there will be tons of work to do to get compatibility right. I think a potentially better path is to try to improve the vendored one, eventually forking it hard. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
We now have a new parser as of #2381. It's not integrated to the core, but it's something we're working on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello! I've been building a transpiler for sql (in rust), and at the end I did a small parser generator that I think is very readable {it is LR(K) so it should have less states that an LR(1)}, I would like to know if rewriting the lexer and the parser is something that is worth doing for Limbo? I am not sure if my parser generator would be more performant than the actual but making the parser more performant and more readable sounds like a good challenge for me :P
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions