You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Following #3142 I've switched from add to re-add to not break encrypted files
However, re-add can't add new files, so you get not managed error and have to remember again that there is a difference between add and re-add
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to have just one command that can handle both cases, so some kind of option/flag that asks re-add to also be able to add new files would be great!
Describe alternatives you've considered
Not sure, thought about maybe checking the error message in an aliased launcher and relaunch the same command with add instead
Or maybe checking if a file is managed beforehand
But that seems too brittle
Additional context
N/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a quick note on this. This makes most sense with exact_ directories, where chezmoi manages all files in a directory, including the deletion of unmanaged files.
Doesn't seem like a dupe, I don't want to add the whole directory, only a specific file. In my case there is no chezmoi add ~/zack_setup_env initial adding step
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Following #3142 I've switched from
add
tore-add
to not break encrypted filesHowever,
re-add
can't add new files, so you getnot managed
error and have to remember again that there is a difference betweenadd
andre-add
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to have just one command that can handle both cases, so some kind of option/flag that asks
re-add
to also be able to add new files would be great!Describe alternatives you've considered
Not sure, thought about maybe checking the error message in an aliased launcher and relaunch the same command with
add
insteadOr maybe checking if a file is managed beforehand
But that seems too brittle
Additional context
N/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: