You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found that Scalaz Diev has lower inserts/deletions than our Diet, but is quite faster in searches. We can balance Diet so we improve search, yet, it might compromise inserts/deletions.
The original Diet paper doesn't talk about balancing it out, but will it be something we should consider?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It has the balancing property, and also implements a faster union and intersection than the one Diet uses. Perhaps some of the ideas can be ported over? (I'd be willing to work on this if so). I have a draft paper that describes the implementation.
I found that Scalaz Diev has lower inserts/deletions than our Diet, but is quite faster in searches. We can balance Diet so we improve search, yet, it might compromise inserts/deletions.
The original Diet paper doesn't talk about balancing it out, but will it be something we should consider?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: