Skip to content

MutexSuite timeout on Windows #4446

@durban

Description

@durban

Happened earlier twice in #4377:

And now it happened #4362 after I've merged series/3.x into that branch:

For posterity (because GH will delete the logs):

[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.ConcurrentMutex handle multiple concurrent cancels during release  120.015s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[info]   + ConcurrentMutex preserve waiters order (FIFO) on a non-race cancellation 0.0s
[info]   + ConcurrentMutex cancellation must not corrupt Mutex 0.0s
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.Mutex with dual constructors execute action if free  120.024s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.Mutex with dual constructors be reusable  120.002s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.Mutex with dual constructors free on error  120.007s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors block action if not free 0.0s
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors used concurrently 0.0s
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors free on cancellation 0.0s
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors allow cancellation if blocked waiting for lock 0.0s
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors gracefully handle canceled waiters 0.0s
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.Mutex with dual constructors not deadlock when highly contended  120.015s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.Mutex with dual constructors handle cancelled acquire  120.015s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.Mutex with dual constructors handle multiple concurrent cancels during release  120.017s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors preserve waiters order (FIFO) on a non-race cancellation 0.0s
[info]   + Mutex with dual constructors cancellation must not corrupt Mutex 0.0s
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.MapK'd Mutex execute action if free  120.013s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.MapK'd Mutex be reusable  120.013s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.MapK'd Mutex free on error  120.016s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex block action if not free 0.0s
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex used concurrently 0.0s
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex free on cancellation 0.0s
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex allow cancellation if blocked waiting for lock 0.0s
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex gracefully handle canceled waiters 0.0s
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.MapK'd Mutex not deadlock when highly contended  120.009s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.MapK'd Mutex handle cancelled acquire  120.016s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[error] ==> X cats.effect.std.MutexSuite.MapK'd Mutex handle multiple concurrent cancels during release  120.013s java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: test timed out after 120 seconds
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex preserve waiters order (FIFO) on a non-race cancellation 0.0s
[info]   + MapK'd Mutex cancellation must not corrupt Mutex 0.0s

As I've mentioned in #4377, I fear that this could be something real (but unsure what exactly). The common thing seems to be windows.

Also, could this be the same as #4445?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions