Replies: 1 comment
-
@masih-e I am not able to replicate your failure for 9193010, but I tested only the c48-5deg cases. See
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I’m opening this discussion because we are ready to submit an update for the fire_behavior model, but we’re encountering an issue. I ran the regression tests, and the following are failing:
cpld_control_c48_5deg intel
cpld_warmstart_c48_5deg intel
control_diag_debug intel
atmaero_control_p8_rad intel
atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro intel
I’ve also run the tests without our modifications, and they still fail for the UFS weather model hash #9193010a. It looks like the outputs don't match the baseline. We are using Derecho, and you can find the logs here:
/glade/derecho/scratch/masih/ufs-weather-model/tests
Please advise if we can proceed with the PR despite these failures. Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Masih
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions