You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following the discussion in issue #862 it is worth think about how we can capture remote maintenance considerations within PROCESS. One option is to introduce a set of constraints to capture issues like
Geometry and space allocation
Blanket segmentation and masses
Maintenance time
Costs (maybe)
Building sizes
This could also help capture some of the design complexity when making an increasing smaller machine.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Following the discussion in issue #862 it is worth think about how we can capture remote maintenance considerations within PROCESS. One option is to introduce a set of constraints to capture issues like
This could also help capture some of the design complexity when making an increasing smaller machine.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions