We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If you attempt to run an IN.DAT where the initial value of an iteration variable matches the lower bound it will fail. For example
ixc = 61 * gapds boundl(61) = 0.12 gapds = 1.2000e-01 * gap between inboard vacuum vessel and thermal shield (m) (`iteration variable 61`)
will result in failure. However if this is replaced like below it will pass.
ixc = 61 * gapds boundl(61) = 0.12 gapds = 1.2000001e-01 * gap between inboard vacuum vessel and thermal shield (m) (`iteration variable 61`)
Whilst a value for gapds of 1.2000000000001e-01 will not. This must be due to some sort of precision issue ie using == instead of is_close etc.
Problem should be fixed so that an iteration can start on its lower bound (or even if it rounds at high precision to lower bound).
Alternatively for another iteration variable like thwcndut:
ixc = 58 * thwcndut boundl(58) = 4.0d-3 thwcndut = 3.9999999999999999999999e-03
will succeed despite being below the bound, so has different behavior to gapds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If you attempt to run an IN.DAT where the initial value of an iteration variable matches the lower bound it will fail. For example
will result in failure. However if this is replaced like below it will pass.
Whilst a value for gapds of 1.2000000000001e-01 will not. This must be due to some sort of precision issue ie using == instead of is_close etc.
Problem should be fixed so that an iteration can start on its lower bound (or even if it rounds at high precision to lower bound).
Alternatively for another iteration variable like thwcndut:
will succeed despite being below the bound, so has different behavior to gapds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: