-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Open
Description
- I got this issue
SyntaxError: Unexpected number in JSON at position 4
when running my tests for Forms.

- After some digging, I found out that the
user.json
file that has been generated by the authentication setup test has an issue. Here's myuser.json
file looks like.
{
"cookies": [
{
"name": "UMB_UCONTEXT",
"value": "too long so I replace with this text",
"domain": "localhost",
"path": "/",
"expires": 1730285391.9487,
"httpOnly": true,
"secure": true,
"sameSite": "Lax"
}
],
"origins": [
{
"origin": "https://localhost:44337",
"localStorage": [
{
"name": "umb:serverUpgradeCheck",
"value": "{\"type\":\"Minor\",\"comment\":\"14.3.1.0 is released. Upgrade today - it's free!\",\"url\":\"http://our.umbraco.org/contribute/releases/1431?version=14.3.0\",\"expires\":\"2024-11-06T10:29:53.981Z\"}"
},
{
"name": "umb:lastUpgradeCheck",
"value": "2024-10-30T10:29:53.517Z"
},
{
"name": "umb:userAuthTokenResponse",
"value": "{\"access_token\":\"MbUYnSVIAxyFPERMF2K-4eKEGhmStVoHVlpmoHfy8X8\",\"refresh_token\":\"-9oFAFT4vmhCvwmZkhF4OEhw4TRqsUELbz_5yjpwr34\",\"scope\":\"offline_access\",\"token_type\":\"Bearer\",\"issued_at\":1730284192,\"expires_in\":\"300\"}"
}
]
}
]
}
- By removing
umb:lastUpgradeCheck
, my tests run successfully. I figured out the value2024-10-30T10:29:53.517Z
is somehow causing the issue. I updated it to this:
{
"name": "umb:lastUpgradeCheck",
"value": "{\"date\":\"2024-10-30T09:24:53.264Z\"}
}
and everything is ok.
-
Also, by looking at the
updateLocalStorage()
in ApiHelpers, I believe usingdata.origins[0].localStorage[0]
to getumb:userAuthTokenResponse
is inappropriate. With my above json file,umb:userAuthTokenResponse
is the third element, not the first, sodata.origins[0].localStorage[0]
would return incorrect result.
I would suggest using other approach like
data.origins[0].localStorage.find(l => l.name == "umb:userAuthTokenResponse")
or any other approach that fits would be better. -
I'm not really sure if this is the correct repo to create this issue or not. Let me know if I need to create this in another repo.
Thanks.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels