You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In ONI, rights statements need to be displayed somewhere on the page. This is supposed to already happen, so we need to investigate to see if this is a bug or if Oregon (me) forgot to implement the rights properly in order to get them showing up.
Moving forward, NCA needs to be able to tell ONI about the rights statements in use. ONI will need an API endpoint to allow NCA to say "this LCCN has this rights statement".
This can get tricky, since rights statements are time-based: a publisher may be public domain prior to 1930 (or whatever the rolling cutoff is), http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/ from 1930 to 2005, and then http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ from 2005 to "now". NCA, however, only stores the current value.
We might have to just have a caveat in NCA saying whatever rights statement is used will simply be what we use for all dates after the rolling PD date. Not ideal, but NCA was never made to manage this stuff and the Scoop grant is definitely the wrong time to try to do much beyond integrating what we already have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In ONI, rights statements need to be displayed somewhere on the page. This is supposed to already happen, so we need to investigate to see if this is a bug or if Oregon (me) forgot to implement the rights properly in order to get them showing up.
Moving forward, NCA needs to be able to tell ONI about the rights statements in use. ONI will need an API endpoint to allow NCA to say "this LCCN has this rights statement".
This can get tricky, since rights statements are time-based: a publisher may be public domain prior to 1930 (or whatever the rolling cutoff is),
http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
from 1930 to 2005, and thenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
from 2005 to "now". NCA, however, only stores the current value.We might have to just have a caveat in NCA saying whatever rights statement is used will simply be what we use for all dates after the rolling PD date. Not ideal, but NCA was never made to manage this stuff and the Scoop grant is definitely the wrong time to try to do much beyond integrating what we already have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: