Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/topics/eval-intro.md has several issues #102

Open
stockholmux opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

/topics/eval-intro.md has several issues #102

stockholmux opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@stockholmux
Copy link
Member

In review before publishing #91, eval-intro.md has several issues:

  • Has several references that should be primary/replica
  • Links to an unknown hash docs/topics/protocol#resp-arrays (probably should be #arrays)
  • Weird bang in front of !SCRIPT in heading (looks like this may have been some sort of now dead markup)
  • Has references to old versionsIn Redis OSS 5.0, effects replication became the default mode., Starting with Redis OSS 3.2, it is possible to select an alternative replication method., starting with Redis OSS 5.0
@zuiderkwast
Copy link
Contributor

  • Weird bang in front of !SCRIPT in heading (looks like this may have been some sort of now dead markup)

The "Weird bang" is from the old redis website. All commands in backticks were automatically linked to the command doc pages. The bang prevents this from being interpreted as the SCRIPT command.

I kept it intentionally because I assumed you know about it and I thought we may want to keep this behaviour. I don't like it though since it's kind of hidden secret markup.

It is good to have links between the topics pages and the command pages though, but not every occurrence needs to be linked. How about we link explicitly to the command on the first occurrence on each page?

A script could update all the pages and occurrences of !STUFF throught the pages. (The bangs are present in the replies JSON and commands JSON files too btw.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants