Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：采→采用？ #644

Open
YDX-2147483647 opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：采→采用？ #644

YDX-2147483647 opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
內容修正/fix

Comments

@YDX-2147483647
Copy link
Contributor

YDX-2147483647 commented Jan 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Tip

Update: The original part of this issue was resolved in #645. Please see #644 (comment) for other parts.

CLReq 目前大多写采用、采取，有些单独的采读不太通，建议改正。

北大CCL语料库的现代汉语数据中，采用相同出现于 321 个文档，而采相同只出现于 12 个文档，采用比单独的采常用二十多倍。不过我不确定是否有繁简差异。

截图

图片
图片

如果需要，我可以发PR。
@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Jan 10, 2025

个人觉得可以统一用「采用」。

@YDX-2147483647 YDX-2147483647 changed the title 疑似缺字：采→采用？ Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：采→采用？ Jan 10, 2025
@YDX-2147483647
Copy link
Contributor Author

YDX-2147483647 commented Jan 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

我尝试在 #645 改了下，又发现若干小问题。可能需要更新《簡繁體詞彙表》或附录B。

中英对不上

用词不统一

YDX-2147483647 added a commit to YDX-2147483647/clreq that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2025
@YDX-2147483647
Revise translation of small words
3c9ae17 
- zh-hans: `采` → `采用`/`为`/ (deleted)
- zh-hant: `采`/`採` → `採`/`採用`/`為`/ (deleted)

Relates-to: w3c#644
@YDX-2147483647 YDX-2147483647 mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2025
Merged
xfq added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
@YDX-2147483647 @xfq
Revise translation of small words (#645)
61204fd 
- zh-hans: `采` → `采用`/`为`/ (deleted)
- zh-hant: `采`/`採` → `採`/`採用`/`為`/ (deleted)

Relates-to: #644

Co-authored-by: Fuqiao Xue <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
內容修正/fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@xfq @YDX-2147483647