Superroute still displayed after going from type=route to type=network

[ppete2]

Any idea why besides Route "660" there's also a Route number "014" at https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/47.5207/13.6863 ?
I cant find a route relation ref="014" attached to way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46974589

[lonvia]

That was the fault of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8433485, should fix itself slowly with new updates coming in.

Looks like we don't invalidate when a route looses its hiking status.

[ppete2]

Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8433485 : Do you think tag "route=hiking" should be added?
Because it's part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/223156 with tags type=network + route=hiking (Or should "route=hiking" deleted here since it's no "type=route" anyway?)

[lonvia]

I'd rather use network=hiking but it doesn't look like there is any consistent tagging.