feature request(docs): Mention Rsdoctor in Rstack docs

[vegerot]

What problem does this feature solve?

Modern.js, Rsbuild, and EdenX don't even mention Rsdoctor in their "Improve build performance" docs, and Rspack only mentions it at the end.

Rsdoctor has a superset of the webpack-bundle-analyzer features, so we should mention Rsdoctor as the default in these docs.

Related: To make this smoother, we need to do two more things:

1. We need to make supports.tileGraph enabled by default.
2. Switch modern build --analyze to use Rsdoctor instead of webpack-bundle-analyzer.
   3. Include Rsdoctor as a dependency, or prompt devs to install it nvm we already prompt devs to install it

[chenjiahan]

I agree that it would be better to recommend Rsdoctor in the "Improve build performance" docs, PR welcome 😄

I'd like to clarify that Rsbuild has recommended Rsdoctor in several places in the documentation, such as:

• https://rsbuild.dev/guide/debug/rsdoctor
• https://rsbuild.dev/guide/debug/build-profiling#using-rsdoctor
• https://rsbuild.dev/guide/optimization/optimize-bundle#detect-duplicate-dependencies

And changing the implementation of modern build --analyze is a breaking change for Modern.js, maybe you can file an issue in the Modern.js repo.

[easy1090]

We need to make supports.tileGraph enabled by default.

@vegerot
The default setting for supports.tileGraph is disabled because webpack-bundle-analyzer performs additional graph calculations and other logic, which can add some time-consuming. Additionally, rsdoctor already has artifact analysis capabilities and will, in the future, provide visual representations showing the proportion of different packages within a specific asset, like this type of graph. Would this potentially replace your need for tileGraph?

The proportion of packages within an asset or the proportion of modules within an asset：

[vegerot]

webpack-bundle-analyzer performs additional graph calculations and other logic, which can be very time-consuming.

We're currently recommending users use webpack-bundle-analyzer over Rsdoctor, so that doesn't factor into it.

Would this potentially replace your need for tileGraph?

I just want to update our Rstack (EdenX, Modern.js, Rsbuild, Rspack) docs to tell them to use Rsdoctor to diagnose build performance issues. We currently tell devs to use webpack-bundle-analyzer instead of Rsdoctor. If the new visual analysis tool would be enough to recommend it in Rstack docs over webpack-bundle-analyzer then sure.

In the meantime, since Rsdoctor already is a superset of webpack-bundle-analyzer when tileGraph is enabled, let's just tell devs to Rsdoctor instead of webpack-bundle-analyzer.