Releases: web3swift-team/web3swift
3.0.2
What's Changed
- feat: added support for JSON RPC Error object by @JeneaVranceanu in #635
Full Changelog: 3.0.1...3.0.2
3.0.1
What's Changed
- chore: EthereumBloomFilter improvement by @JeneaVranceanu in #606
- feat: EIP-4361 - or Sign in with Ethereum (SIWE) by @JeneaVranceanu in #615
- fix: EIP712 - allow arbitrary EIP712Hashable data models by @JeneaVranceanu in #618
- fix: ReadOperation data wasn't set and was returned incorrectly by @JeneaVranceanu in #620
- fix: ERC20 read properties function fixed - multiple inlined async/await was causing issues by @JeneaVranceanu in #623
- fix: detailed response of parsing EIP4361 by @JeneaVranceanu in #627
- chore: some clean up of web3 eth calls, comments and tests by @JeneaVranceanu in #621
- fix: EIP4361 - improved validation by adding ability to extract invalid values for all fields by @JeneaVranceanu in #628
Full Changelog: 3.0.0...3.0.1
3.0.0
The whole new way to do Etherum on swift
TLDR
This release changes whole way of iterating with Etherum chain in a terms of creating, preparing, sending transaction and receiving receipt on it. Now it’s:
- unified — only one struct
CodableTransaction
to handle - consistent — no more transaction to transaction merging, just create one, configure it, and assign it to
[Read|WriteOperation]
. - clear — intention of all types and methods are obvious by their names, most of them are generic based, so no more casting to and out of
Any
. - less error prone — we’ve cleared so much legacy code in that pipeline which only God know what it does, so now seeing source of a method of your interess is a breath.
Unified
Previously there were four (!) types that is being used to prepare and send transaction:
EthereumTransaction
TransactionParameters
EthereumParameters
TransactionOptions
Now their all gone and there’s only one to have: CodableTransaction
, this one covers all previous usecases, because it’s actually just all in one merged yet.
Unfortunately it’s not as clean as i wish it would be, but despite hurting my sense of perfection it’s much, much more better way to work with that it was before.
So now to create transaction that you would send to a node further you sould just do the follow:
let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
Web3.eth.send(transaction)
CodableTransaction
overview
So let’s take a look at CodableTransaction
most important properties closer:
- Full access
{ get set }
:from: EthereumAddress?
— from property to fill it where it needs to.to: EthereumAddress
— adressee of a transaction, the only required property on membervise initnalizaion.type: TransactionType
— Type of transaction in Ethereum mainnet mean, 0 — legacy, 1 — post EIP-2930, 2 — post EIP-1559.chainID: BigUInt?
— The chainId that transaction is targeted for.value: BigUInt
— The native value of a transaction.data: Data
— data property of a trancaction, most used whilist contract iterating.callOnBlock: BlockNumber?
— Block number to call a given transaction on.accessList: [AccessListEntry]?
— access list for contract execution (EIP-2930 and EIP-1559 only).
- Indirect properties
{ get set }
(could be changed in release):- Nonce — the nonce for the transaction
nonce: BigUInt { get }
noncePolicy: NoncePolicy { set }
- GasLimit — the max number of gas units allowed to process this transaction
gasLimit: BigUInt { get }
gasLimitPolicy: GasLimitPolicy { set }
- GasPrice — the price per gas unit for the tranaction (Legacy and EIP-2930 only)
gasPrice: BigUInt? { get }
gasPricePolicy: GasPricePolicy { set }
- MaxFeePerGas — the max base fee per gas unit (EIP-1559 only)
maxFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
maxFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
- MaxPriorityFeePerGas — the maximum tip to pay the miner (EIP-1559 only)
maxPriorityFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
maxPriorityFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
- Nonce — the nonce for the transaction
- Computed properties
{ get }
:meta: EthereumMetadata?
— this one provides some information about already executed transaction, such isblockHash
,transactionIndex
,gasprice
and some related.sender: EthereumAddress?
— the address of the sender of the transaction recovered from the signature.hash: Data?
— A transaction hash.- Sgnature data components:
v: BigUInt
— signature v component.r: BigUInt
— signature r component.s: BigUInt
— signature s component.
Consistent
Second big chunk of improvement has happened with [Read|Write]Transaction
types. So this is actually the general type to iterate with contracts. While doing so you’ve constantly creating and passing this and there this struct, which is encapsulate in itself all contract related data (contract
object, method
that you willing to call, transaction
to be sent to). So this those structs are now renamed into [Read|Write]Operation
respectively, so as their methods. Dispite that all pipeline is kept the same, so to make some read contract call you have to do follow:
let contract = Web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()
and for write call follow:
let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = Web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")
Clarity
You haven’t look under the hood before, but i did, and it was scary one. It suddenly appears that resolving and managing nothing, but five objects to send something peace of bite a chain is not as easy as it might be thoughts, so there was a mess in both method intents and their implementation.
Transaction pipeline
Now most of it’s gone, and the rule number one: You should not merge any transaction by yourself.
- If you want to prepare you call for a given contract method on a contract pipeline stage there’s
CodableTransaction
property in it. - If you want to prepare such on a operation stage there’s
CodableTransaction
property in it too.
Both these properties named transaction
and one assigns another, when Contract
creates appropriate Operation
to be sent.
So thil all leads to rule number two: You should work to any you would like, but only one transaction object. Please pay attention to it, it’s still possible to passing your transaction all around your code while filling it in, but it’s strongly not recomendet. The better way is to choose one place where CodableTransaction
instance would be filled and implement utility methods that filled it in with appropriate data, like BigUInt
for gasWhatever
and BlockNumber
for callOnBlock
properties.
Network layer
There’s totally new network layer API.
It based on generic implementation and on some cascade of protocols. Let’s take a closer look in it.
How to
Using new API is as easy as write three line of a code:
func feeHistory(blockCount: UInt, block: BlockNumber, percentiles:[Double]) async throws -> Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory {
let requestCall: APIRequest = .feeHistory(blockCount, block, percentiles)
let response: APIResponse<Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: Web3.provider, for: requestCall) /// explicitly declaring `Result` type is **required**.
return response.result
}
- On the first line you’re creating a request where passing all required and strictly typed parameters.
- On a second you’re both declaring expected
Result
type and making a network request. - On the third one you’re reaching result itself.
And that’s it, you’re done here.
Error prone
Thanks to @mliot`s work it’s under the hood transaction signing/decoding with respect to its type.
So actually you don’t need to feel data
property by yourself in most of cases, because it happening itself and it happening on WriteOperation.writeToChain
and ReadOperation.callContractMethod
e.g. on the very end of the whole pipeline1.
Recap
So let’s recap new available API pipelines.
Native transaction send
let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
Web3.eth.send(transaction)
Contract read method call
let contract = Web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()
Contract write on chain method call
let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = Web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")
Sending network request to a node
func feeHistory(blockCount: UInt, block: BlockNumber, percentiles:[Double]) async throws -> Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory {
let requestCall: APIRequest = .feeHistory(blockCount, block, percentiles)
let response: APIResponse<Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: Web3.provider, for: requestCall) /// explicitly declaring `Result` type is **required**.
return response.result
}
-
This is actually not a whole true, because in that stage it’s just all g... ↩
3.0.0-RC5
New Transaction pipeline
TLDR
This PR changes whole way of creating, preparing, sending transaction and receiving receipt on it. Now it’s:
- unified — only one struct
CodableTransaction
to handle - consistent — no more transaction to transaction merging, just create one, configure it, and assign it to
[Read|WriteOperation]
. - clear — intention of all types and methods are obvious by their names.
- error prone — we’ve cleared so much legacy code in that pipeline which only God know what it does, so now seeing source of a method of your interess is a breath.
Unified
Previously there were four (!) types that is being used to prepare and send transaction:
EthereumTransaction
TransactionParameters
EthereumParameters
TransactionOptions
Now their all gone and there’s only one to have: CodableTransaction
, this one covers all previous usecases, because it’s actually just all in one merged yet.
Unfortunately it’s not as clean as i wish it would be, but despite hurting my sense of perfection it’s much, much more better way to work with that it was before.
So now to create transaction that you would send to a node further you sould just do the follow:
let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
web3.eth.send(transaction)
CodableTransaction
overview
So let’s take a look at CodableTransaction
most important properties closer:
- Full access
{ get set }
:from: EthereumAddress?
— from property to fill it where it needs to.to: EthereumAddress
— adressee of a transaction, the only required property on membervise initnalizaion.type: TransactionType
— Type of transaction in Ethereum mainnet mean, 0 — legacy, 1 — post EIP-2930, 2 — post EIP-1559.chainID: BigUInt?
— The chainId that transaction is targeted for.value: BigUInt
— The native value of a transaction.data: Data
— data property of a trancaction, most used whilist contract iterating.callOnBlock: BlockNumber?
— Block number to call a given transaction on.accessList: [AccessListEntry]?
— access list for contract execution (EIP-2930 and EIP-1559 only).
- Indirect properties
{ get set }
(could be changed in release):- Nonce — the nonce for the transaction
nonce: BigUInt { get }
noncePolicy: NoncePolicy { set }
- GasLimit — the max number of gas units allowed to process this transaction
gasLimit: BigUInt { get }
gasLimitPolicy: GasLimitPolicy { set }
- GasPrice — the price per gas unit for the tranaction (Legacy and EIP-2930 only)
gasPrice: BigUInt? { get }
gasPricePolicy: GasPricePolicy { set }
- MaxFeePerGas — the max base fee per gas unit (EIP-1559 only)
maxFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
maxFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
- MaxPriorityFeePerGas — the maximum tip to pay the miner (EIP-1559 only)
maxPriorityFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
maxPriorityFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
- Nonce — the nonce for the transaction
- Computed properties
{ get }
:meta: EthereumMetadata?
— this one provides some information about already executed transaction, such isblockHash
,transactionIndex
,gasprice
and some related.sender: EthereumAddress?
— the address of the sender of the transaction recovered from the signature.hash: Data?
— A transaction hash.- Sgnature data components:
v: BigUInt
— signature v component.r: BigUInt
— signature r component.s: BigUInt
— signature s component.
Consistent
Second big chunk of improvement has happened with [Read|Write]Transaction
types. So this is actually the general type to iterate with contracts. While doing so you’ve constantly creating and passing this and there this struct, which is encapsulate in itself all contract related data (contract
object, method
that you willing to call, transaction
to be sent to). So this those structs are now renamed into [Read|Write]Operation
respectively, so as their methods. Dispite that all pipeline is kept the same, so to make some read contract call you have to do follow:
let contract = web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()
and for write call follow:
let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")
Clarity
You haven’t look under the hood before, but i did, and it was scary one. It suddenly appears that resolving and managing nothing, but five objects to send something peace of bite a chain is not as easy as it might be thoughts, so there was a mess in both method intents and their implementation.
Now most of it’s gone, and the rule number one: You should not merge any transaction by yourself.
- If you want to prepare you call for a given contract method on a contract pipeline stage there’s
CodableTransaction
property in it. - If you want to prepare such on a operation stage there’s
CodableTransaction
property in it too.
Both these properties named transaction
and one assigns another, when Contract
creates appropriate Operation
to be sent.
So thil all leads to rule number two: You should work to any you would like but only one transaction object. Please pay attention to it, it’s still possible to passing your transaction all around your code while filling it in, but it’s strongly not recomendet. The better way is to choose one place where CodableTransaction
instance would be filled and implement utility methods that filled it in with appropriate data, like BigUInt
for gasWhatever
and BlockNumber
for callOnBlock
properties.
Error prone
Thanks to @mliot`s work it’s under the hood transaction signing/decoding with respect to its type.
So actually you don’t need to feel data
property by yourself in most of cases, because it happening itself and it happening on WriteOperation.writeToChain
and ReadOperation.callContractMethod
e.g. on the very end of the whole pipeline1.
Recap
There’s a something left to do, to make all it production ready, but it wouldn’t be any revolutionary in terms of API design either main pipelines stages. So let’s recap new available API pipelines.
Native transaction send
let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
web3.eth.send(transaction)
Contract read method call
let contract = web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()
Contract write on chain method call
let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")
Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC4...3.0.0-RC5
-
This is actually not whole true, because in that stage it’s just all gas related properties gets resolved. ↩
3.0.0-RC4
What's Changed
- Added cocoapods support by @yaroslavyaroslav
- ContractProtocol: support for overloaded functions in ABI by @JeneaVranceanu in #587
- Fixed warnings at compile time by @JeneaVranceanu in #605
- Fix for EIP681: parsing of arrays and encoding of EIP681Code into URL by @JeneaVranceanu in #604
Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC3...3.0.0-RC4
3.0.0-RC3
What's Changed
- Split library into modules by @yaroslavyaroslav in #589
Now there's separate module Core
which implements network methods released in previous RC and base structures.
Also some refactoring and code cleaning have been done.
Also there were applied PR review fixups for previous release (thanks to @JeneaVranceanu)
Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC2...3.0.0-RC3
2.6.6
What's Changed
- Add telegram support group into REAMDE.md by @yaroslavyaroslav in #571
- Chore: public structs with initializers by @JeneaVranceanu in #594
Full Changelog: 2.6.5...2.6.6
3.0.0-RC2
What's Changed
- Generic network layer by @yaroslavyaroslav in #577
How to
Using new API is as easy as write three line of a code:
func feeHistory(blockCount: UInt, block: BlockNumber, percentiles:[Double]) async throws -> Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory {
let requestCall: APIRequest = .feeHistory(blockCount, block, percentiles)
let response: APIResponse<Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: web3.provider, for: requestCall) /// explicitly declaring `Result` type is **required**.
return response.result
}
- On the first line you’re creating a request where passing all required and strictly typed parameters.
- On a second you’re both declaring expected
Result
type and making a network request. - On the third one you’re reaching result itself.
And that’s it, you’re done here.
Types overview
There’s follow types have been implemented
Main types
public enum APIRequest
This is the main type of whole network layer API. It responsible to both compose API request to a node and to send it to a node with a given provider (which stores Node URL and session), as cases it have all available JSON RPC requests and most of them have associated values to pass request parameters there.
Additionally it have follow computed properties:
public responseType: APIResultType.Type
- this variable returns appropriateResult
generic parameter type for each API call. Which can be split generally in two parts:- Literals (e.g.
Int
,BigInt
) which could not be extended on client side. - Decodable structures (e.g.
Block
) which could be extended on client side. That said that user able to add additionalResult
type on their side if it’s not literal (e.g. if it’s astruct
orclass
).
- Literals (e.g.
method: REST
- this internal variable returns REST method for each API call. Currently its returning onlyPOST
one.parameters: [RequestParameter]
- this internal variable is purposed to return parameters of request as an heterogeneous Array which is Node expected in most cases.encodedBody: Data
- this internal variable returns encoded data ofRequestBody
type, which is required to compose correct request to a Node.call: String
- this internal variable returns method call string, which is one of property ofRequestBody
type.
There’s two methods are provided for API calls.
public static func sendRequest<Result>(with provider: Web3Provider, for call: APIRequest) async throws -> APIResponse<Result>
- this method is the main one. It composes and sends request to a Node. This method could be called only with explicitly return type declaration likelet response: APIResponse<BigUInt> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: self.provider, for: .gasPrice)
, whereresponse
is the whole APIResponse struct with a service properties and theresponse.result
is a point of interests in example above — gas price.
static func setupRequest(for call: APIRequest, with provider: Web3Provider) -> URLRequest
- this internal method is just composing network request from all properties of relatedAPIRequest
case.
public struct APIResponse<Result>: Decodable where Result: APIResultType
This generic struct is any Ethereum node response container, where all stored properties are utility fields and one generic result: Result
is the property that stores strictly typed result of any given request.
Protocols
To make things work there’s are some protocols be presented which both adds restriction to types that could be passed within new API and add some common methods to Literal types to be able initialize it from a hex string.
APIResultType
This protocol responsible for any nonliteral type that could be stored within APIResponse<Result>
generic struct. This protocol have no requirements except it conforms Decodable
protocol. So any decodable type could be extended to conforms it.
LiteralInitiableFromString
This protocol responsible for any literal types that could be stored within APIResponse<Result>
. This protocol conforms APIResultType
and it adds some requirements to it, like initializer from hex string. Despite that a given type could be extended to implement such initializer ==this should be done on a user side== because to make it work it requires some work within sendRequest
method to be done.
IntegerInitableWithRadix
This protocol is just utility one, which declares some convenient initializer which have both Int
and BigInt
types, but don’t have any common protocol which declares such requirement.
Utility types
struct RequestBody: Encodable
— just a request body that passes into request body.public enum REST: String
— enum of REST methods. OnlyPOST
andGET
presented yet.enum RequestParameter
— this enum is a request composing helper. It make happened to encode request attribute as heterogeneous array.protocol APIRequestParameterType: Encodable
— this type is part of theRequestParameter
enum mechanism which purpose is to restrict types that can be passed as associated types withinRequestParameter
cases.protocol APIRequestParameterElementType: Encodable
— this type purpose is the same asAPIRequestParameterType
one except this one is made forElement
s of anArray
s when the latter is an associated type of a givenRequestParameter
case.
Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC1...3.0.0-RC2
2.6.5
What's Changed
Full Changelog: 2.6.4...2.6.5
3.0.0-RC1
NOTE: This is the first 3.0.0 release, e.g. it's alpha. We're not guarantee any reliability neither API stability in further versions.
Main features
- This RC removes
Promise
concurrency types from the library and replace them to modernasync/await
concurrency mechanism. - Increased minimal OS version that support by the lib: iOS 13, macOS 10.5 (due to
async/await
). - This is the last version which supports
Carthage
dependency manager, on3.0.0-RC2
it'll be dropped due to its low prevalence.
What's Changed
- Remove Promises by @pharms-eth in #515
- Update unstable branch with 2.6.1 patch by @yaroslavyaroslav in #541
- Refactor ci/cd pipeline by @yaroslavyaroslav in #545
- update docs for automatic gas. by @yaroslavyaroslav in #556
- Automatic Gas rewrite for
unstable
branch by @mloit in #559 - Merge master into develop by @yaroslavyaroslav in #562
- develop to unstable by @yaroslavyaroslav in #563
Full Changelog: 2.6.4...3.0.0-RC1