Skip to content

Releases: web3swift-team/web3swift

3.0.2

11 Oct 11:54
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

What's Changed

Full Changelog: 3.0.1...3.0.2

3.0.1

05 Oct 15:24
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

What's Changed

Full Changelog: 3.0.0...3.0.1

3.0.0

23 Sep 06:29
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

The whole new way to do Etherum on swift

TLDR

This release changes whole way of iterating with Etherum chain in a terms of creating, preparing, sending transaction and receiving receipt on it. Now it’s:

  • unified — only one struct CodableTransaction to handle
  • consistent — no more transaction to transaction merging, just create one, configure it, and assign it to [Read|WriteOperation].
  • clear — intention of all types and methods are obvious by their names, most of them are generic based, so no more casting to and out of Any.
  • less error prone — we’ve cleared so much legacy code in that pipeline which only God know what it does, so now seeing source of a method of your interess is a breath.

Unified

Previously there were four (!) types that is being used to prepare and send transaction:

  • EthereumTransaction
  • TransactionParameters
  • EthereumParameters
  • TransactionOptions

Now their all gone and there’s only one to have: CodableTransaction, this one covers all previous usecases, because it’s actually just all in one merged yet.

Unfortunately it’s not as clean as i wish it would be, but despite hurting my sense of perfection it’s much, much more better way to work with that it was before.

So now to create transaction that you would send to a node further you sould just do the follow:

let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
Web3.eth.send(transaction)

CodableTransaction overview

So let’s take a look at CodableTransaction most important properties closer:

  1. Full access { get set }:
    • from: EthereumAddress? — from property to fill it where it needs to.
    • to: EthereumAddress — adressee of a transaction, the only required property on membervise initnalizaion.
    • type: TransactionType — Type of transaction in Ethereum mainnet mean, 0 — legacy, 1 — post EIP-2930, 2 — post EIP-1559.
    • chainID: BigUInt? — The chainId that transaction is targeted for.
    • value: BigUInt — The native value of a transaction.
    • data: Data — data property of a trancaction, most used whilist contract iterating.
    • callOnBlock: BlockNumber? — Block number to call a given transaction on.
    • accessList: [AccessListEntry]? — access list for contract execution (EIP-2930 and EIP-1559 only).
  2. Indirect properties { get set } (could be changed in release):
    1. Nonce — the nonce for the transaction
      • nonce: BigUInt { get }
      • noncePolicy: NoncePolicy { set }
    2. GasLimit — the max number of gas units allowed to process this transaction
      • gasLimit: BigUInt { get }
      • gasLimitPolicy: GasLimitPolicy { set }
    3. GasPrice — the price per gas unit for the tranaction (Legacy and EIP-2930 only)
      • gasPrice: BigUInt? { get }
      • gasPricePolicy: GasPricePolicy { set }
    4. MaxFeePerGas — the max base fee per gas unit (EIP-1559 only)
      • maxFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
      • maxFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
    5. MaxPriorityFeePerGas — the maximum tip to pay the miner (EIP-1559 only)
      • maxPriorityFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
      • maxPriorityFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
  3. Computed properties { get }:
    • meta: EthereumMetadata? — this one provides some information about already executed transaction, such is blockHash, transactionIndex, gasprice and some related.
    • sender: EthereumAddress? — the address of the sender of the transaction recovered from the signature.
    • hash: Data? — A transaction hash.
    • Sgnature data components:
      • v: BigUInt — signature v component.
      • r: BigUInt — signature r component.
      • s: BigUInt — signature s component.

Consistent

Second big chunk of improvement has happened with [Read|Write]Transaction types. So this is actually the general type to iterate with contracts. While doing so you’ve constantly creating and passing this and there this struct, which is encapsulate in itself all contract related data (contract object, method that you willing to call, transaction to be sent to). So this those structs are now renamed into [Read|Write]Operation respectively, so as their methods. Dispite that all pipeline is kept the same, so to make some read contract call you have to do follow:

let contract = Web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()

and for write call follow:

let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = Web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")

Clarity

You haven’t look under the hood before, but i did, and it was scary one. It suddenly appears that resolving and managing nothing, but five objects to send something peace of bite a chain is not as easy as it might be thoughts, so there was a mess in both method intents and their implementation.

Transaction pipeline

Now most of it’s gone, and the rule number one: You should not merge any transaction by yourself.

  1. If you want to prepare you call for a given contract method on a contract pipeline stage there’s CodableTransaction property in it.
  2. If you want to prepare such on a operation stage there’s CodableTransaction property in it too.

Both these properties named transaction and one assigns another, when Contract creates appropriate Operation to be sent.

So thil all leads to rule number two: You should work to any you would like, but only one transaction object. Please pay attention to it, it’s still possible to passing your transaction all around your code while filling it in, but it’s strongly not recomendet. The better way is to choose one place where CodableTransaction instance would be filled and implement utility methods that filled it in with appropriate data, like BigUInt for gasWhatever and BlockNumber for callOnBlock properties.

Network layer

There’s totally new network layer API.
It based on generic implementation and on some cascade of protocols. Let’s take a closer look in it.

How to

Using new API is as easy as write three line of a code:

func feeHistory(blockCount: UInt, block: BlockNumber, percentiles:[Double]) async throws -> Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory {
    let requestCall: APIRequest = .feeHistory(blockCount, block, percentiles)
    let response: APIResponse<Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: Web3.provider, for: requestCall) /// explicitly declaring `Result` type is **required**.
    return response.result
}
  1. On the first line you’re creating a request where passing all required and strictly typed parameters.
  2. On a second you’re both declaring expected Result type and making a network request.
  3. On the third one you’re reaching result itself.

And that’s it, you’re done here.

Error prone

Thanks to @mliot`s work it’s under the hood transaction signing/decoding with respect to its type.

So actually you don’t need to feel data property by yourself in most of cases, because it happening itself and it happening on WriteOperation.writeToChain and ReadOperation.callContractMethod e.g. on the very end of the whole pipeline1.

Recap

So let’s recap new available API pipelines.

Native transaction send

let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
Web3.eth.send(transaction)

Contract read method call

let contract = Web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()

Contract write on chain method call

let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = Web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")

Sending network request to a node

func feeHistory(blockCount: UInt, block: BlockNumber, percentiles:[Double]) async throws -> Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory {
    let requestCall: APIRequest = .feeHistory(blockCount, block, percentiles)
    let response: APIResponse<Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: Web3.provider, for: requestCall) /// explicitly declaring `Result` type is **required**.
    return response.result
}
  1. This is actually not a whole true, because in that stage it’s just all g...

Read more

3.0.0-RC5

07 Sep 16:05
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
3.0.0-RC5 Pre-release
Pre-release

New Transaction pipeline

TLDR

This PR changes whole way of creating, preparing, sending transaction and receiving receipt on it. Now it’s:

  • unified — only one struct CodableTransaction to handle
  • consistent — no more transaction to transaction merging, just create one, configure it, and assign it to [Read|WriteOperation].
  • clear — intention of all types and methods are obvious by their names.
  • error prone — we’ve cleared so much legacy code in that pipeline which only God know what it does, so now seeing source of a method of your interess is a breath.

Unified

Previously there were four (!) types that is being used to prepare and send transaction:

  • EthereumTransaction
  • TransactionParameters
  • EthereumParameters
  • TransactionOptions

Now their all gone and there’s only one to have: CodableTransaction, this one covers all previous usecases, because it’s actually just all in one merged yet.

Unfortunately it’s not as clean as i wish it would be, but despite hurting my sense of perfection it’s much, much more better way to work with that it was before.

So now to create transaction that you would send to a node further you sould just do the follow:

let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
web3.eth.send(transaction)

CodableTransaction overview

So let’s take a look at CodableTransaction most important properties closer:

  1. Full access { get set }:
    • from: EthereumAddress? — from property to fill it where it needs to.
    • to: EthereumAddress — adressee of a transaction, the only required property on membervise initnalizaion.
    • type: TransactionType — Type of transaction in Ethereum mainnet mean, 0 — legacy, 1 — post EIP-2930, 2 — post EIP-1559.
    • chainID: BigUInt? — The chainId that transaction is targeted for.
    • value: BigUInt — The native value of a transaction.
    • data: Data — data property of a trancaction, most used whilist contract iterating.
    • callOnBlock: BlockNumber? — Block number to call a given transaction on.
    • accessList: [AccessListEntry]? — access list for contract execution (EIP-2930 and EIP-1559 only).
  2. Indirect properties { get set } (could be changed in release):
    1. Nonce — the nonce for the transaction
      • nonce: BigUInt { get }
      • noncePolicy: NoncePolicy { set }
    2. GasLimit — the max number of gas units allowed to process this transaction
      • gasLimit: BigUInt { get }
      • gasLimitPolicy: GasLimitPolicy { set }
    3. GasPrice — the price per gas unit for the tranaction (Legacy and EIP-2930 only)
      • gasPrice: BigUInt? { get }
      • gasPricePolicy: GasPricePolicy { set }
    4. MaxFeePerGas — the max base fee per gas unit (EIP-1559 only)
      • maxFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
      • maxFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
    5. MaxPriorityFeePerGas — the maximum tip to pay the miner (EIP-1559 only)
      • maxPriorityFeePerGas: BigUInt? { get }
      • maxPriorityFeePerGasPolicy: FeePerGasPolicy { set }
  3. Computed properties { get }:
    • meta: EthereumMetadata? — this one provides some information about already executed transaction, such is blockHash, transactionIndex, gasprice and some related.
    • sender: EthereumAddress? — the address of the sender of the transaction recovered from the signature.
    • hash: Data? — A transaction hash.
    • Sgnature data components:
      • v: BigUInt — signature v component.
      • r: BigUInt — signature r component.
      • s: BigUInt — signature s component.

Consistent

Second big chunk of improvement has happened with [Read|Write]Transaction types. So this is actually the general type to iterate with contracts. While doing so you’ve constantly creating and passing this and there this struct, which is encapsulate in itself all contract related data (contract object, method that you willing to call, transaction to be sent to). So this those structs are now renamed into [Read|Write]Operation respectively, so as their methods. Dispite that all pipeline is kept the same, so to make some read contract call you have to do follow:

let contract = web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()

and for write call follow:

let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")

Clarity

You haven’t look under the hood before, but i did, and it was scary one. It suddenly appears that resolving and managing nothing, but five objects to send something peace of bite a chain is not as easy as it might be thoughts, so there was a mess in both method intents and their implementation.

Now most of it’s gone, and the rule number one: You should not merge any transaction by yourself.

  1. If you want to prepare you call for a given contract method on a contract pipeline stage there’s CodableTransaction property in it.
  2. If you want to prepare such on a operation stage there’s CodableTransaction property in it too.

Both these properties named transaction and one assigns another, when Contract creates appropriate Operation to be sent.

So thil all leads to rule number two: You should work to any you would like but only one transaction object. Please pay attention to it, it’s still possible to passing your transaction all around your code while filling it in, but it’s strongly not recomendet. The better way is to choose one place where CodableTransaction instance would be filled and implement utility methods that filled it in with appropriate data, like BigUInt for gasWhatever and BlockNumber for callOnBlock properties.

Error prone

Thanks to @mliot`s work it’s under the hood transaction signing/decoding with respect to its type.

So actually you don’t need to feel data property by yourself in most of cases, because it happening itself and it happening on WriteOperation.writeToChain and ReadOperation.callContractMethod e.g. on the very end of the whole pipeline1.

Recap

There’s a something left to do, to make all it production ready, but it wouldn’t be any revolutionary in terms of API design either main pipelines stages. So let’s recap new available API pipelines.

Native transaction send

let transaction: CodableTransaction = .emptyTransaction
transaction.from = from ?? transaction.sender // `sender` one is if you have private key of your wallet address, so public key e.g. your wallet address could be infereted
transaction.value = value
transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(78423)
transaction.gasPricePolicy = .manual(20000000000)
web3.eth.send(transaction)

Contract read method call

let contract = web3.contract(Web3.Utils.erc20ABI, at: receipt.contractAddress!)!
let readOp = contract.createReadOperation("name")!
readOp.transaction.from = EthereumAddress("0xe22b8979739D724343bd002F9f432F5990879901")
let response = try await readTX.callContractMethod()

Contract write on chain method call

let abiString = "[]" // some ABI string
let bytecode = Data.fromHex("") // some ABI bite sequence
let contract = web3.contract(abiString, at: nil, abiVersion: 2)!
let parameters = [...] as [AnyObject]
let deployOp = contract.prepareDeploy(bytecode: bytecode, constructor: contract.contract.constructor, parameters: parameters)!
deployOp.transaction.from = "" // your address
deployOp.transaction.gasLimitPolicy = .manual(3000000)
let result = try await deployTx.writeToChain(password: "web3swift")

Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC4...3.0.0-RC5

  1. This is actually not whole true, because in that stage it’s just all gas related properties gets resolved.

3.0.0-RC4

19 Aug 07:06
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
3.0.0-RC4 Pre-release
Pre-release

What's Changed

Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC3...3.0.0-RC4

3.0.0-RC3

26 Jul 06:29
7665ff5
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
3.0.0-RC3 Pre-release
Pre-release

What's Changed

Now there's separate module Core which implements network methods released in previous RC and base structures.
Also some refactoring and code cleaning have been done.
Also there were applied PR review fixups for previous release (thanks to @JeneaVranceanu)

Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC2...3.0.0-RC3

2.6.6

19 Jul 11:06
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

What's Changed

Full Changelog: 2.6.5...2.6.6

3.0.0-RC2

10 Jun 15:57
aa155f4
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
3.0.0-RC2 Pre-release
Pre-release

What's Changed

How to

Using new API is as easy as write three line of a code:

func feeHistory(blockCount: UInt, block: BlockNumber, percentiles:[Double]) async throws -> Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory {
    let requestCall: APIRequest = .feeHistory(blockCount, block, percentiles)
    let response: APIResponse<Web3.Oracle.FeeHistory> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: web3.provider, for: requestCall) /// explicitly declaring `Result` type is **required**.
    return response.result
}
  1. On the first line you’re creating a request where passing all required and strictly typed parameters.
  2. On a second you’re both declaring expected Result type and making a network request.
  3. On the third one you’re reaching result itself.

And that’s it, you’re done here.

Types overview

There’s follow types have been implemented

Main types

public enum APIRequest

This is the main type of whole network layer API. It responsible to both compose API request to a node and to send it to a node with a given provider (which stores Node URL and session), as cases it have all available JSON RPC requests and most of them have associated values to pass request parameters there.

Additionally it have follow computed properties:

  • public responseType: APIResultType.Type - this variable returns appropriate Result generic parameter type for each API call. Which can be split generally in two parts:
    • Literals (e.g. Int, BigInt) which could not be extended on client side.
    • Decodable structures (e.g. Block) which could be extended on client side. That said that user able to add additional Result type on their side if it’s not literal (e.g. if it’s a struct or class).
  • method: REST - this internal variable returns REST method for each API call. Currently its returning only POST one.
  • parameters: [RequestParameter] - this internal variable is purposed to return parameters of request as an heterogeneous Array which is Node expected in most cases.
  • encodedBody: Data - this internal variable returns encoded data of RequestBody type, which is required to compose correct request to a Node.
  • call: String - this internal variable returns method call string, which is one of property of RequestBody type.

There’s two methods are provided for API calls.

  • public static func sendRequest<Result>(with provider: Web3Provider, for call: APIRequest) async throws -> APIResponse<Result> - this method is the main one. It composes and sends request to a Node. This method could be called only with explicitly return type declaration like let response: APIResponse<BigUInt> = try await APIRequest.sendRequest(with: self.provider, for: .gasPrice), where response is the whole APIResponse struct with a service properties and the response.result is a point of interests in example above — gas price.
  • static func setupRequest(for call: APIRequest, with provider: Web3Provider) -> URLRequest - this internal method is just composing network request from all properties of related APIRequest case.

public struct APIResponse<Result>: Decodable where Result: APIResultType

This generic struct is any Ethereum node response container, where all stored properties are utility fields and one generic result: Result is the property that stores strictly typed result of any given request.

Protocols

To make things work there’s are some protocols be presented which both adds restriction to types that could be passed within new API and add some common methods to Literal types to be able initialize it from a hex string.

APIResultType

This protocol responsible for any nonliteral type that could be stored within APIResponse<Result> generic struct. This protocol have no requirements except it conforms Decodable protocol. So any decodable type could be extended to conforms it.

LiteralInitiableFromString

This protocol responsible for any literal types that could be stored within APIResponse<Result>. This protocol conforms APIResultType and it adds some requirements to it, like initializer from hex string. Despite that a given type could be extended to implement such initializer ==this should be done on a user side== because to make it work it requires some work within sendRequest method to be done.

IntegerInitableWithRadix

This protocol is just utility one, which declares some convenient initializer which have both Int and BigInt types, but don’t have any common protocol which declares such requirement.

Utility types

  • struct RequestBody: Encodable — just a request body that passes into request body.
  • public enum REST: String — enum of REST methods. Only POST and GET presented yet.
  • enum RequestParameter — this enum is a request composing helper. It make happened to encode request attribute as heterogeneous array.
  • protocol APIRequestParameterType: Encodable — this type is part of the RequestParameter enum mechanism which purpose is to restrict types that can be passed as associated types within RequestParameter cases.
  • protocol APIRequestParameterElementType: Encodable — this type purpose is the same as APIRequestParameterType one except this one is made for Elements of an Array s when the latter is an associated type of a given RequestParameter case.

Full Changelog: 3.0.0-RC1...3.0.0-RC2

2.6.5

26 May 05:25
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

What's Changed

  • correct the decoding key for from in transactionOptions by @mloit in #570

Full Changelog: 2.6.4...2.6.5

3.0.0-RC1

09 May 05:53
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
3.0.0-RC1 Pre-release
Pre-release

NOTE: This is the first 3.0.0 release, e.g. it's alpha. We're not guarantee any reliability neither API stability in further versions.

Main features

  • This RC removes Promise concurrency types from the library and replace them to modern async/await concurrency mechanism.
  • Increased minimal OS version that support by the lib: iOS 13, macOS 10.5 (due to async/await).
  • This is the last version which supports Carthage dependency manager, on 3.0.0-RC2 it'll be dropped due to its low prevalence.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: 2.6.4...3.0.0-RC1