Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi @xd003, each application should ideally have its own configuration and permission set. That’s why the recommended approach is to run a dedicated instance of the socket-proxy for each application. The memory footprint is very small, so the overhead is negligible. Technically, you can use a single instance for multiple setups (see #5), but I wouldn’t recommend it. There’s also an open issue aiming to make it possible to configure different hosts individually in the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, I’m setting up this project for the first time. I have multiple containers that need access to the Docker socket. My question is, do I need to run a separate instance of the socket-proxy for each container compose file, or will a single instance be sufficient for all of them?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions