You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2019. It is now read-only.
I also like using 'check is' rather than 'ensure do', because it will show be right in the test results the difference between what was encountered and what was expected.
However, unless I misunderstand the slim protocol (and a quick glance at the code seems to confirm this), Xebium doesn't know the expectation of the 'check is' command, so it has no way of determining whether a command was in error.
Do I understand this correctly? Can we have the best of both worlds? How?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like saving screenshots after errors.
I also like using 'check is' rather than 'ensure do', because it will show be right in the test results the difference between what was encountered and what was expected.
However, unless I misunderstand the slim protocol (and a quick glance at the code seems to confirm this), Xebium doesn't know the expectation of the 'check is' command, so it has no way of determining whether a command was in error.
Do I understand this correctly? Can we have the best of both worlds? How?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: