I don't understand the point of Glance...

[tedbergstrand]

This is just a new tab that has less functionality, covers up my working tab, takes longer to appear and disappear, and is irretrievable after returning to the working tab... I don't get it. I think Glance should be thrown out in place of a hotkey to open the tab in a new split. Or Glance should be treated as a form of a split.

Temporary windows don't make sense to me. I'm perfectly capable of hitting the back/close button and Glance doesn't improve on that experience-- you still have to close the Glance window, just like you'd close a tab. The Open and Close Glance animations take considerably longer than opening/closing a new tab, and the performance in a Glance window seems to be worse than a regular tab, though this is just a feeling.

The term Glance implies speed. But this is slower than popping open a handful of new tabs in the background and hotkey closing them.

Glance just sets me up so if I stumble into something in a Glance window, I have to do extra user actions to get it to become a "permanent" tab. I think what would really let me "glance" at something is to hotkey a new split on the click that I can Ctrl+W away when I'm done with it.

I get that it's pretty, but Pretty != Zen.

Is there any use-case you guys have found where Glance is superior to a new tab/split?

[joaovl5]

just opened your issue through glance to have a quick peek at what its about. it acts as kind of a temporary view: I don't want a tab I won't be using to take more space on my sidebar. hope this helps understand the use cases.

[tedbergstrand]

Right, but you still have to close it. So it's no different than a tab. You're closing it either way. It's just slower and irretrievable. It's the same action count, but worse usability.

What difference does it make if there's a tab open for the 30 seconds you're glancing into it? You have to close both. So whether you're closing a Glance or closing a tab, you wind up back in the same place with the same screen layout and the same number of tabs.

[joaovl5]

It's easier to close it and go back to the page, this might sound trivial but makes a ton of difference when you have to quickly peek at dozens of pages at once

[tedbergstrand]

I'm not trying to be argumentative. I'm genuinely trying to understand what you mean.

But I'm still struggling to understand the workflow difference. You can't Glance at 12 pages at once. So you open one, close it. Open the next, close it. How is that workflow different than splitting the tab, closing it, splitting the new tab, closing it...

Isn't it the same thing? Why is it its own implementation instead of a new version of a Split that opens midscreen at 85% size and closes when it loses focus?

[cheeeebs]

You don't have to use it. I use it because I inadvertently have a lot of tabs left opened, even if unloaded, because I use compact mode and I don't see the tab bar. It's a useful feature but it's not for everyone, but like everything in Zen Browser it's an option and isn't forced on the user.

It's also a feature that has been requested by other users, so it's not just a few that want this and have a use for it.

[tedbergstrand]

I asked if anyone had a use-case that was superior to a tab or split and opined that it should really be a split option, instead. And that we should be able to choose which way to split it with that hotkey instead of being forced into Glance. (Glance, of course, still being an option).

I know that people requested it. I don't want to take it away from anyone. I don't want anyone who likes it to stop using it. I just think it's poorly implemented and I don't get it in its current form.