Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproduce the performance of the paper on AffectNet and FERPlus #12

Open
Delete12137 opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@Delete12137
Copy link

Delete12137 commented Feb 19, 2023

Thank you very much for your work.!
I basically reproduce the performance you showed in the article on rafdb with res18 as the backbone, but for the two datasets of AffectNet and FERPlus, I can't reproduce the performance . Can you provide the parameters and random seed settings on these two datasets when the backbone is resnet18? thank you very much!

@chenhao-user
Copy link

Hi!Have you successfully reproduced the accuracy of resnet18 when rafdb(89.99 %) is considered a clean dataset? The accuracy of my reproduction is much lower.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants