You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much for your work.!
I basically reproduce the performance you showed in the article on rafdb with res18 as the backbone, but for the two datasets of AffectNet and FERPlus, I can't reproduce the performance . Can you provide the parameters and random seed settings on these two datasets when the backbone is resnet18? thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!Have you successfully reproduced the accuracy of resnet18 when rafdb(89.99 %) is considered a clean dataset? The accuracy of my reproduction is much lower.
Thank you very much for your work.!
I basically reproduce the performance you showed in the article on rafdb with res18 as the backbone, but for the two datasets of AffectNet and FERPlus, I can't reproduce the performance . Can you provide the parameters and random seed settings on these two datasets when the backbone is resnet18? thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: