Skip to content

Missing async API #306

Open
Open
@triforcely

Description

@triforcely

I understand why #262 happened, and I agree that async-over-sync is a bad practice. What is the reason for not using actual async implementation, though?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions