added not parted of licensed work

[Sunnesoft]

No description provided.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude finished @Sunnesoft's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Added "not part of licensed work" notices

Review Summary

This PR adds licensing clarification notices to example implementation files to clearly distinguish them from the core Aqua protocol, which is licensed under the Degensoft Aqua Source License 1.1. The changes help establish clear licensing boundaries within the codebase.

Changes Reviewed

Files modified with licensing notices:

1. README.md - License badge update
2. examples/apps/ABCWeightedSwap.sol - Added GPL-3.0 license notice
3. examples/apps/libs/FixedPoint.sol - Added GPL-3.0 license notice
4. examples/apps/libs/LogExpMath.sol - Added MIT license notice
5. examples/apps/libs/WeightedMath.sol - Added GPL-3.0 license notice
6. examples/test/ABCWeightedSwap.t.sol - Added GPL-3.0 license notice

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

Positive aspects:

• Clear and consistent license header format across all modified files
• Proper SPDX license identifiers used
• License notices are appropriately placed at the beginning of each file after the SPDX identifier
• The notices explicitly state these files are "NOT part of the Aqua Licensed Work"
• Each notice specifies the alternative license (GPL-3.0 or MIT) that applies

Observations:

• The core protocol files in src/ directory correctly retain the Aqua Source License
• The example app XYCSwap.sol does NOT have this notice, suggesting it remains under the Aqua license
• The differentiation helps developers understand which code they can use more freely

Potential Issues 🔍

License Consistency:

• LogExpMath.sol uses MIT license while other example files use GPL-3.0. This is intentional as it matches the original Balancer source license
• The PR title mentions "added not parted of licensed work" - appears to be a typo ("parted" should be "part")

Security Concerns ✅

No security issues identified. This is purely a licensing clarification change with no code logic modifications.

Performance Considerations ✅

No performance impact. These are documentation-only changes that don't affect runtime behavior.

Test Coverage ✅

The test file ABCWeightedSwap.t.sol was appropriately updated with the same licensing notice. No additional tests needed for licensing changes.

Recommendations

1. Fix PR title typo: "parted" → "part"
2. Consider adding to THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES: Since these example files reference external projects (Balancer), ensure proper attribution is maintained
3. Documentation: Consider updating the main README to explain the dual licensing approach for clarity

Conclusion

This is a well-executed licensing clarification that helps developers understand which parts of the codebase are subject to the restrictive Aqua license versus which example implementations can be used more freely under GPL-3.0 or MIT licenses. The changes are consistent and properly implemented.

Approved ✅ - The PR successfully clarifies licensing boundaries without introducing any technical issues.