Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Own Timeout #157

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cvanbrederode
Copy link

Added the ability to change the timeout from the default of 2000 msec.

ku16MBResponseTimeout was renamed to ku16MBDefaultTimeout. The private variable _u16ResponseTimeout was created, along with getResponseTimeout() and setResponseTimeout() methods.

Description

[Describe what this change achieves]

Issues Resolved

[List any existing issues this PR resolves; include Fixes #xxx or Closes #xxx (where xxx is issue number)]

Check List

General

  • Code follows coding style defined in STYLE.md
  • Doxygen comments are included inline with code
  • No unnecessary whitespace; check with git diff --check before committing.

The following have been modified to reflect new features, if warranted

  • README.md
  • keywords.txt (use tabs as whitespace separators)
  • library.properties
  • examples/ - update or create new ones, as warranted

The following have NOT been modified

  • doc/ - will be updated upon versioned release
  • .ruby-gemset
  • .ruby-version
  • CHANGELOG.md - will be updated upon versioned release (HISTORY.md is deprecated)
  • Gemfile
  • LICENSE
  • VERSION - will be updated upon versioned release

Added the ability to change the timeout from the default of 2000 msec.

ku16MBResponseTimeout was renamed to ku16MBDefaultTimeout.  The private variable _u16ResponseTimeout was created, along with getResponseTimeout() and setResponseTimeout() methods.
@cvanbrederode cvanbrederode changed the title #124 Create Own Timeout Apr 22, 2021
@perotom
Copy link

perotom commented Nov 24, 2022

Very important feature which should be present already. Great work.

@ThomasHaag2
Copy link

useful change, thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants