Skip to content

refactor: suppress connectToNoble() in FastUSDC proposals in A3p tests #11240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Chris-Hibbert
Copy link
Contributor

@Chris-Hibbert Chris-Hibbert commented Apr 9, 2025

refs: #305
refs: #230
refs: #228

Description

Require a platform parameter when building the proposal for fastUSDC-GTM, so we can suppress the call to connectToNoble() on A3P, where there is no Noble connections.

Security Considerations

None

Scaling Considerations

None

Documentation Considerations

The proposal builder complains if it doesn't get a parameter. The only value it compares to is A3P-INTEGRATION.

Testing Considerations

This enabled adding proposal 89 to agoric-3-proposals.

Upgrade Considerations

Moving tests from a3p-integration to agoric-3-proposals unblocks preparing new releases. The affected upgrade has already been applied to mainNet.

@Chris-Hibbert Chris-Hibbert self-assigned this Apr 9, 2025
@Chris-Hibbert Chris-Hibbert requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2025 17:18
@turadg turadg mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2025
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
closes: https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-private/issues/305

## Description

The 'gtm' release is in A3P now,
- https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-3-proposals/pull/230/files

and included in the a3p-integration history.
- #11233


### Security Considerations
n/a

### Scaling Considerations
n/a

### Documentation Considerations
n/a

### Testing Considerations

See whether this is necessary,
- #11240

### Upgrade Considerations
n/a
@turadg turadg closed this Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants