Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix debian packaging #42

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix debian packaging #42

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

SlavekB
Copy link

@SlavekB SlavekB commented Jul 25, 2016

Renaming libsbjson2.3-dev to libsbjson-dev resolves conflict with the official distribution package.

Adding libldap2-dev dependency solves FTBFS when building SOGo in a clean chroot environment (pbuilder). Include files in libsope-ldap-dev require the include files from libldap2-dev. Therefore I consider it right that libldap2-dev should be listed as a dependency in libsope-ldap-dev.

to bring it in line with the official Debian/Ubuntu packages
This prevents FTBFS in projects that uses libsope-ldap-dev
@zsalab
Copy link

zsalab commented Jan 10, 2017

Maybe I'm wrong but how far I understand the packaging for the libsbjson is not even required because it is in the all main debian/ubuntu stable releases (from wheezy in debian and from trusty in ubuntu).
It also looks like just a repackaging of the official libsbjson, I could not find anything that shows it compile it.

@SlavekB
Copy link
Author

SlavekB commented Jan 11, 2017

Inverse branch of SBJson contains one commit that addresses crash if result is NSNull. See: 45339ab

@SlavekB
Copy link
Author

SlavekB commented Apr 11, 2017

Added commit 3850f3f, which allows to build on Debian Stretch.

Is there something I could have done to be able to merge the proposed changes?

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jul 16, 2019

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@zsalab
Copy link

zsalab commented Jul 17, 2019

I accepted, but even the recheck does not pick it up :( I saw already accepted if I go again... something wrong with the integration

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants