Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scala repotests #184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025
Merged

scala repotests #184

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

prabhu
Copy link
Contributor

@prabhu prabhu commented Mar 9, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @prabhu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request focuses on enhancing the repository testing workflows by incorporating Scala-based projects. It introduces a new workflow for container tests, modifies existing workflows to include Scala projects, and updates Dockerfiles to ensure the correct working directory for the tests. The changes aim to expand the scope of automated testing to include Scala applications, specifically those using the Play framework.

Highlights

  • Scala Repositories Integration: The pull request integrates Scala-based repositories, specifically 'playframework/play-samples', into the existing repository testing workflows. This includes checking out the repository and running tests against it.
  • Workflow Modifications: The pull request modifies the '.github/workflows/container-tests.yml' and '.github/workflows/repotests.yml' files to include steps for setting up and running Scala tests, including generating usages and uploading artifacts.
  • Dockerfile Updates: The 'ci/Dockerfile' and 'ci/Dockerfile.sle' files are updated to set the working directory to '/app', ensuring that the tests are executed in the correct context within the Docker containers.

Changelog

Click here to see the changelog
  • .github/workflows/container-tests.yml
    • Renamed the 'ruby-samples' job to 'lang-container-tests' (line 9).
    • Added 'scalaresults' to the list of directories created in the 'setup paths' step (line 19).
    • Added a step to checkout the 'playframework/play-samples' repository (lines 35-39).
    • Added a step to generate usages for the 'play-samples' project (lines 63-69).
    • Added a step to upload the 'scalaresults' artifact (lines 75-79).
    • Renamed 'generate usages sbom' to 'generate usages' (lines 45, 49, 52).
  • .github/workflows/repotests.yml
    • Removed the 'main' branch from the push trigger (line 5).
    • Added a step to checkout the 'playframework/play-samples' repository (lines 72-76).
    • Added steps to run atom on various scala projects (lines 143-149).
  • ci/Dockerfile
    • Added 'WORKDIR /app' to set the working directory (line 117).
  • ci/Dockerfile.sle
    • Added 'WORKDIR /app' to set the working directory (line 99).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


The workflows hum, the containers spin,
Scala's code is pulled right in.
From Play's samples, tests ignite,
Ensuring all is working right.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

Signed-off-by: Prabhu Subramanian <[email protected]>
@prabhu prabhu force-pushed the feature/scala-repotests branch from a88819b to 5df5a1c Compare March 9, 2025 22:23
@prabhu prabhu merged commit b7e5c30 into main Mar 9, 2025
33 checks passed
@prabhu prabhu deleted the feature/scala-repotests branch March 9, 2025 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant