-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
Mesa 7.0 branch #531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Mesa 7.0 branch #531
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
e5983b6 to
3a5d1dc
Compare
sunweaver
reviewed
Oct 21, 2017
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| #include <X11/Xmd.h> | ||
| #include <nx-X11/Xmd.h> |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Member
|
@uli42: my sense is to skip the mesa 6.5 PR and directly jump to this one... (or even to a newer one)? |
Member
Author
|
I am at 7.7 at the moment. 8.0 is difficult due to missing foundations. I tend to take latest 7.x and integrate that. Next is upgrading the server to around xorg 1.8.0. Then we should be able to go on with mesa.
Vom Smartphone gesendet.
…----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: "Mike Gabriel" <[email protected]>
Gesendet: 21.10.2017 10:46
An: "ArcticaProject/nx-libs" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Ulrich Sibiller" <[email protected]>; "Mention" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [ArcticaProject/nx-libs] Mesa 7.0 branch (#531)
@uli42: my sense is to skip the mesa 6.5 PR and directly jump to this one... (or even to a newer one)?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Member
|
Hi Uli,
On Sa 21 Okt 2017 11:25:13 CEST, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
I am at 7.7 at the moment. 8.0 is difficult due to missing
foundations. I tend to take latest 7.x and integrate that. Next is
upgrading the server to around xorg 1.8.0. Then we should be able to
go on with mesa.
Ok, let's go for Mesa 7.7 then. For the merging process, I guess it
would be good if you give me access to the PR branch. So that I can
commit fixes if needed directly into the PR itself.
Get back to me, when any of the branches is ready for a second glimpse.
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139
GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de
|
Member
Author
|
We don't have that 'indirect_dispatch.c' file in 3.6.x And if we had it would come from Mesa
and belong to the Mesa patchset.
…On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Mike Gabriel ***@***.***> wrote:
@sunweaver commented on this pull request.
________________________________
In nx-X11/programs/Xserver/GL/glx/indirect_dispatch.c:
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
* SOFTWARE.
*/
-#include <X11/Xmd.h>
+#include <nx-X11/Xmd.h>
@uli42: shouldn't this commit (48a080b) be pulled over to the small_fixes PR
#532 ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
works for mesa tag mesa_6_5
Mesa has no tag for the 7.0.4 release, so we use the latest commit in the mesa_7_0_branch (which is 77a8e26bf824b45c1244f5699d7cbfca0fe0a48a). Unfortunately we are going _down_ version wise: Building nx-libs with Mesa 7.0 results in glxinfo reporting: OpenGL version string: 1.2 (2.1 Mesa 7.0) But building with Mesa 7.0.4 results in OpenGL version string: 1.2 (2.0 Mesa 7.0.4) Reason: 7.0.4 disables one OpenGL extension essential for OpenGL 2.1 called GL_ARB_shading_language_120 (because it is not feature complete).
3a5d1dc to
29437f8
Compare
Member
|
will be superceded by #534 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this obsoletes the mesa70 PR #529
Mesa has no tag for the 7.0.4 release, so we use the latest commit in
the mesa_7_0_branch (which is 77a8e26bf824b45c1244f5699d7cbfca0fe0a48a).
Unfortunately we are going down version wise:
Building nx-libs with Mesa 7.0 results in glxinfo reporting:
OpenGL version string: 1.2 (2.1 Mesa 7.0)
But building with Mesa 7.0.4 results in
OpenGL version string: 1.2 (2.0 Mesa 7.0.4)
Reason: 7.0.4 disables one OpenGL extension essential for OpenGL 2.1
called GL_ARB_shading_language_120 (because it is not feature
complete).