Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
update formatting of eebox page
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@auds2020
auds2020 committed Jan 28, 2025
1 parent 17b679e commit cd08b40
Showing 1 changed file with 64 additions and 42 deletions.
106 changes: 64 additions & 42 deletions Blogs/MechE/eebox.html
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -123,48 +123,70 @@ <h2 class="entry-title">
</ul>
</div> -->
<div class="entry-content">
<p>
The purpose of a custom electronics box is to provide a lightweight, accessible, easily modifiable, cool (temperature-wise), splash-proof housing for Fish ‘N Ships’ electrical components.
</p>
<p><i>Design 1:</i></p>
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">The initial design of the EE box focused on accessibility, modularity, and thermals. It consisted of an ⅛”
aluminum base, ⅛” acrylic walls, removable faceplates, a large “land” lid, and smaller “water” lids. This version of the box condensed the boat’s
sensors and electronics into a single sub-assembly--i.e., its “brains”--that could be removed and tested independent of the hulls. The electronics
were designed to mount to slightly elevated acrylic pegboards (elevated for subterranean wire management). Thermals were managed passively by aluminum
“sleeves” that wrapped completely around the hulls and made direct contact with the box’s aluminum base. Overall footprint was roughly 32”x16”x6.5”
(not counting the height of the sensor mast).
</p>
<img src="../../Pictures/Blogs/eebox1.png" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: auto; margin-bottom: 30px; max-width: 90%; max-height:400px;">
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">The second iteration of the box was driven by a single design requirement the first design failed to meet: weight.
The original design weighed ~13 lbs, roughly 12% of the team’s weight budget at the time. This egress prompted a spirited discussion of the
necessity of a custom EE box--off the shelf options are cheaper, require less manpower (from the team at least), are rated to depths well
beyond the design requirements of the box, and commonly used by RoboBoat teams. Modifying such boxes--while inelegant--is neither costly
nor difficult, though it does make the box’s original pressure rating irrelevant. The question thus became: can we manufacture a box that
offers a better weight to volume ratio than the leading alternative? And would it be worth the cost? We decided there was a high probability
we could--and that the cost was more than justified by the learning experience.
</p>
<p><i>Design 2:</i></p>
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">Design two features the elevated peg boards and removable faceplates of the first design, only this time they’re
compressed into a footprint roughly a third the size (12”x16”x8”). To account for this compressed footprint the pegboards were elevated ~4” off
the base (enough room to rotate the average human hand comfortably)--opening up a second layer for mounting components. The focus on weight reduction
meant the old aluminum base with its heat finned cooling system was a non starter.. Fabric--engineered by a fashion industry focused on breathability,
water resistance, and weight--was the obvious replacement. The new box was constructed almost entirely out of an ⅛” plywood frame, and the lid draped
in PolyUrethane Laminate--a lightweight, durable, water resistant cloth commonly used for DIY diapers. Finally, fans, protected by 3D printed shrouds,
were added for increased airflow.
</p>
<img src="../../Pictures/Blogs/eebox2.png" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: auto; margin-bottom: 30px; max-width: 90%; max-height:400px;">
<p><i>Current Design:</i></p>
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">The current design retains many of the core innovations of the previous two--including the elevated peg boards,
fabric lid, and removable faceplates. The primary driver of this iteration was usability feedback from the EE team: a self locating pin was added
to make aligning the lid easier when latching the box shut and to prevent water from pooling during rainy tests; the number of mounting screws per
faceplate was doubled to prevent water from entering the box when rogue waves swept over the deck; 1/32” aluminum L brackets were fastened to the edges
of the acrylic pegboards to prevent the previous bowing/flexing/swaying behavior that made mounting components to the pegboards difficult; compliant hooks
were added to keep the latches in the “upright” position while lowering the lid; and the Jetson was mounted on L-bracket stand-offs to allow for rapid
insertion and removal from the box. Once the wooden seams of the base were caulked with a polyether adhesive the box proved watertight to 16cm (at which
point water entered via the fan out take), well above design spec.
</p>
<img src="../../Pictures/Blogs/eebox3.png" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: auto; margin-bottom: 30px; max-width: 90%; max-height:400px;">
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12 col-sm-4 py-2">
<p>
The purpose of a custom electronics box is to provide a lightweight, accessible, easily modifiable, cool (temperature-wise), splash-proof housing for Fish ‘N Ships’ electrical components.
</p>
<p>
At first, we debated if we even needed a custom EE box. Off the shelf options are cheaper, require less labor from us, are rated to depths well
beyond the design requirements of the box, and are already commonly used by RoboBoat teams. Modifying such boxes, while inelegant, is neither costly
nor difficult, though it does make the box’s original pressure rating irrelevant. The question thus became: can we manufacture a box that
offers a better weight to volume ratio than the leading alternative? And would it be worth the cost? We decided there was a high probability
we could--and that the cost was more than justified by the learning experience.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6 col-sm-4 py-2">
<h4>Version 1:</h4>
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">The initial design of the EE box focused on accessibility, modularity, and thermals. It consisted of an ⅛”
aluminum base, ⅛” acrylic walls, removable faceplates, a large “land” lid, and smaller “water” lids. This version of the box condensed the boat’s
sensors and electronics into a single sub-assembly--i.e., its “brains”--that could be removed and tested independent of the hulls. The electronics
were designed to mount to slightly elevated acrylic pegboards (elevated for subterranean wire management). Thermals were managed passively by aluminum
“sleeves” that wrapped completely around the hulls and made direct contact with the box’s aluminum base. Overall footprint was roughly 32”x16”x6.5”
(not counting the height of the sensor mast). This first design weighed ~13 lbs, roughly 12% of the team’s weight budget at the time, which we decided was far too much, which led us to make major changes in version 2.
</p>
</div>
<div class="col-lg-6 col-sm-4 py-2">
<img src="../../Pictures/Blogs/eebox1.png">
</div>
</div>

<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6 col-sm-4 py-2">
<h4>Version 2:</h4>
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">Design two features the elevated peg boards and removable faceplates of the first design, only this time they’re
compressed into a footprint roughly a third the size (12”x16”x8”). To account for this compressed footprint the pegboards were elevated ~4” off
the base (enough room to rotate the average human hand comfortably)--opening up a second layer for mounting components. The focus on weight reduction
meant the old aluminum base with its heat finned cooling system was a non starter.. Fabric--engineered by a fashion industry focused on breathability,
water resistance, and weight--was the obvious replacement. The new box was constructed almost entirely out of an ⅛” plywood frame, and the lid draped
in PolyUrethane Laminate--a lightweight, durable, water resistant cloth commonly used for DIY diapers. Finally, fans, protected by 3D printed shrouds,
were added for increased airflow.
</p>
</div>
<div class="col-lg-6 col-sm-4 py-2">
<img src="../../Pictures/Blogs/eebox2.png">
</div>
</div>

<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6 col-sm-4 py-2">
<h4>Version 3 (Current Design):</h4>
<p style="text-indent: 50px;">The current design retains many of the core innovations of the previous two--including the elevated peg boards,
fabric lid, and removable faceplates. The primary driver of this iteration was usability feedback from the EE team: a self locating pin was added
to make aligning the lid easier when latching the box shut and to prevent water from pooling during rainy tests; the number of mounting screws per
faceplate was doubled to prevent water from entering the box when rogue waves swept over the deck; 1/32” aluminum L brackets were fastened to the edges
of the acrylic pegboards to prevent the previous bowing/flexing/swaying behavior that made mounting components to the pegboards difficult; compliant hooks
were added to keep the latches in the “upright” position while lowering the lid; and the Jetson was mounted on L-bracket stand-offs to allow for rapid
insertion and removal from the box. Once the wooden seams of the base were caulked with a polyether adhesive the box proved watertight to 16cm (at which
point water entered via the fan out take), well above design spec.
</p>
</div>
<div class="col-lg-6 col-sm-4 py-2">
<img src="../../Pictures/Blogs/eebox3.png">
</div>
</div>
</main><!-- End #main -->

<!-- ======= Footer ======= -->
Expand Down

0 comments on commit cd08b40

Please sign in to comment.