Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

local_CS_script_fix to properly create provision shard config file in CS directory #1079

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

davidleerh
Copy link
Collaborator

@davidleerh davidleerh commented Jan 10, 2025

What this PR does

This PR makes changes so that it generates the provision shard config file in CS directory properly by pointing to the correct makefile target/command; when running CS locally.
Fixing the issue where the target/command "provision-shard" does not exist under /ARO-HCP/cluster-service/Makefile.

Changes ->
From: "provision-shard"
To: "local-deploy-provision-shard"

In addition, updating the cloud-region-constraints yaml file name to the correct name and to the correct directory:
From: "./configs/cloud-resources/cloud-regions-constraints.yaml"
To: "./configs/cloud-resource-constraints/cloud-region-constraints.yaml"
(conforming with check via
"https://github.com/Azure/ARO-HCP/blob/main/dev-infrastructure/local_CS.sh#L39")

After the infrastructure was deployed with command:
"SKIP_CONFIRM=1 make infra.all deployall"
The above changes were required to successfully connect with the provision shard as well as setting the cloud_regions "westus3" to be enabled in the local instance/run of clusters service.

Jira: N/A
Link to demo recording: N/A

Special notes for your reviewer

N/A

@philipwu08
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@davidleerh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

closing in favor of: #1080

@davidleerh davidleerh closed this Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants