Skip to content

Conversation

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ARO-20543

What

create cluster then use kubernetes API to update the global pull secret, verify pull secret was updated.

Why

confirm pull secret update functionallity.

@mgahagan73 mgahagan73 added hold Do not merge yet ai-assisted AI/LLM tool was used to help create this MR labels Aug 15, 2025
@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test stage-e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test integration-e2e-parallel

Copy link
Collaborator

@mbukatov mbukatov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggesting to simplify deployment phase.

@github-actions
Copy link

Please rebase pull request.

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test integration-e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test prod-e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73 mgahagan73 removed the hold Do not merge yet label Aug 29, 2025
@mgahagan73 mgahagan73 changed the title initial checkin of cluster_pullsecret test [WIP] initial checkin of cluster_pullsecret test Aug 29, 2025
// per test initialization
})

It("should be able to create an HCP cluster and manage pull secrets",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is specific about this flow for ARO HCP? If nothing, this looks like an end-to-end test for HyperShift functionality. Why should we run it in our suite?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This e2e test covers ARO HCP feature ARO-21429, as documented in ARO HCP doc draft. And while most of the changes happened in HyperShift as you say, we find it important to be covered by E2E test.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Please rebase pull request.

@mgahagan73 mgahagan73 marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2025 16:30
@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test images

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/hold cancel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So the test works after refactoring based on testing locally, but it looks like we lost the extra secret repo when we changed the pre-merge test jobs around.

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/hold cancel

@mgahagan73 mgahagan73 marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2025 16:00
@mbukatov
Copy link
Collaborator

mbukatov commented Dec 9, 2025

/test e2e-parallel

geoberle
geoberle previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mgahagan73
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign deads2k for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the approved label Dec 12, 2025
@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test e2e-parallel

2 similar comments
@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test e2e-parallel

@mgahagan73
Copy link
Collaborator Author

replaced by #3637 due to merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai-assisted AI/LLM tool was used to help create this MR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants