How can we enhance the final results to obtain more meaningful and insightful biological findings? #53
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Answer selected by
PhoebeMagdy
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
During the benchmarking process of various models generated by executing a bash script designed to explore different deep learning architectures and combinations of omic data modalities, the different models were evaluated based on their Pearson correlation scores.
It was observed that the highest correlation score achieved was only 0.389583, indicating a relatively low correlation coefficient. Furthermore, upon extracting the top 10 important features, none of them were found to be directly associated with "Erlotinib" in the existing literature, this indeed was expected because of the low correlation
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions