Skip to content

Pode v2.13.0-alpha.2 #1510

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Pode v2.13.0-alpha.2 #1510

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

mdaneri
Copy link
Contributor

@mdaneri mdaneri commented Mar 2, 2025

🚀 Pode v2.13.0-alpha.2 Release Notes

⚠️ This pull is not for merge!!! ⚠️

⚠️ This is an alpha release! ⚠️
This version is not yet stable and may contain breaking changes or unfinished features. Please test carefully before using in production. Feedback and bug reports are highly appreciated!

We’re excited to introduce Pode v2.13.0-alpha.2, packed with significant enhancements, bug fixes, and new features to improve logging, authentication, state management, and service handling across different platforms. 🎉

🔥 Highlights

🛠️ Fixes & Improvements

✨ New Features

⚡ Performance & Security Enhancements

📜 Logging Enhancements


⚠️ This is an alpha release! ⚠️
🔴 This version may contain bugs or unfinished features and is not recommended for production use.
💡 Please test in a safe environment and report any issues you encounter.

🔗 Check out the full changes & discussions here: [Pode GitHub](https://github.com/Badgerati/Pode)

Full Changelog: https://github.com/mdaneri/Pode/commits/v2.13.0-alpha.2

@nightroman
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mdaneri I think #1507 might be included by mistake (sorry if I miss something).

@mdaneri
Copy link
Contributor Author

mdaneri commented Mar 3, 2025

Why do you think so? I’ve included everything that passed the check and haven’t created any visible issues.

@mdaneri
Copy link
Contributor Author

mdaneri commented Mar 3, 2025

I think I mess-up with this build. GIthub not allow me to keep this on.
I'm going to retry

@nightroman
Copy link
Contributor

Why do you think so? I’ve included everything that passed the check and haven’t created any visible issues.

Because #1507 is still open. It was somehow mentioned (by mistake / mistyping?) is some commit, I think.
See (all "mentioned", "referenced" are not correct)

image

@nightroman
Copy link
Contributor

Anyway. You may ignore this. If #1507 is handled correctly after all, it should not be an issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants