-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JNG-6022 [Release] Updating versions #300
JNG-6022 [Release] Updating versions #300
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates various dependency version numbers in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
f0a9d70
to
6c2a52a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pom.xml (1)
68-82
: Review Timestamp Consistency Across Versions
There is a noticeable variation in the timestamp portions of the version strings. For example, some dependencies are updated with a December 2024 date (e.g.,20241202
,20241213
) while several feature-flagged dependencies use a February 2025 date (e.g.,20250219
) and one (judo-meta-ui) uses20250131
. Please verify that these differences are intentional and consistent with your versioning policy, ensuring that they do not lead to dependency mismatches in downstream projects.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pom.xml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: ⏳ Build, test and deploy artifacts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pom.xml (2)
68-68
: Metadata Dependency Version Updates Verified
The version updates for metadata dependencies—specifically for<judo-meta-rdbms-version>
,<judo-meta-ui-version>
,<judo-meta-psm-version>
,<judo-meta-asm-version>
,<judo-meta-expression-version>
, and<judo-meta-liquibase-version>
—have been updated as intended. Please verify that these new version strings (with December 2024 dates for most elements except the UI version) align with your release strategy and that any downstream dependencies expecting these updates are adjusted accordingly.Also applies to: 70-74
75-76
: Feature Identifier Dependency Versions for JNG-6022
The dependencies<judo-dao-api-version>
,<judo-sdk-common-version>
,<judo-operation-utils-version>
,<judo-runtime-core-version>
,<judo-tatami-base-version>
, and<judo-tatami-core-version>
now include the feature identifierfeature_JNG_6022_markSelectedRangeItemsInHttpHeader
. This update appears to be in line with the release objectives. Please confirm that all related modules and dependency resolution mechanisms have been updated to use these new version strings.Also applies to: 78-78, 80-82
No description provided.